Pradeep Pillai

Pradeep Pillai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 26 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in winding up and insolvency law. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 9 complex cases, representing 35% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated expertise across 111 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	16 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 16 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Company Law	12 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 12 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	8 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	7 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice29% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Power of Sale	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liquidation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Clean Hands Doctrine	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Preference	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
De facto director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shadow director	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Setting Aside Default Judgement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Substituted Service	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sexual Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proof of Debt	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounting Irregularities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restraint of Trade	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Accounts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual Interpretation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rape	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Distribution of assets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor-client relationship	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equitable Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Undertaking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Solicitor's duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Discipline	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Derivative action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negative Pledge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shortfall in funds held on trust for creditors	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appropriate method of distributing funds	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trust Receipts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pledges and Pawns	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Pari Passu	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tomlin Order	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Agreement to Lease	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Business Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Trade Secrets	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Receivership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anti-suit injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Pradeep Pillai has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Pradeep Pillai has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 14 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	14 cases	54% of cases	Pars Ram Brothers v ANZ Bank: Commingled Goods, Security Interests & Trust Receipts(Mar 2017) BMD v Public Prosecutor: Rape & Sexual Assault of Intellectually Disabled Victim(Jan 2016) Law Society v Yap Bock Heng: Disciplinary Proceedings for Improper Loan & Accounting Violations(Sep 2014)
PRP Law LLC	6 cases	23% of cases	FXA Investment Holdings v Tan Wei Cheong: Proof of Debt in Liquidation & Lease Termination(Feb 2025) Mface Pte Ltd v. Chin Oi Ching: Unenforceability of Loan Agreement due to Unlicensed Moneylending(Sep 2024) Allianz Capital Partners GmbH v Goh Andress: Extended Fiona Trust Principle & Jurisdiction Clauses(May 2023)
Shook Lin & Bok	3 cases	12% of cases	Malayan Banking Bhd v Lauw Wisanggeni: Enforcement of Deed of Undertaking & Consideration in Contract Law(Sep 2003) WSG Nimbus v Board of Control for Cricket: International Arbitration, Anti-Suit Injunction, and Issue Estoppel(May 2002) Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Breach of Contract & Proof of Debt in Liquidation(Jul 2001)
PRP Law	1 cases	4% of cases	Jian Li Investments v Healthstats: Derivative Action for Trade Secret Mismanagement(Feb 2019)
Shook Lin and Bok	1 cases	4% of cases	Multiplex Constructions v Sintal: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration for Delay Damages(Mar 2005)
ShookLin & Bok	1 cases	4% of cases	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Appeal Timing & Further Arguments(Jun 2001)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Pradeep Pillai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 9 (35%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	83.7 parties avg	3.7	31%
Neutral	210.0 parties avg	10.0	8%
Partial	32.7 parties avg	2.7	12%
Won	133.7 parties avg	3.7	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2005	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	26.5 parties avg	6.5
2010	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2011	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	118.0 parties avg	18.0
2018	110.0 parties avg	10.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Pradeep Pillai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	8(31%)	31%
Neutral	2(8%)	8%
Partial	3(12%)	12%
Won	13(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	3,124,283.73	208,285.5815 cases	15
USD	2,775,149.37	2,775,149.371 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2005	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2025	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 26 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	FXA Investment Holdings v Tan Wei Cheong: Proof of Debt in Liquidation & Lease Termination 11 Feb 2025 FXA Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	11 Feb 2025	FXA Investment Holdings Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application allowed in partApplication allowed in part; liquidators directed to accept proof of debt for $110,701.54 for rent and service charges up to 7 March 2024, and $49,582.19 for the agency fee (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Mface Pte Ltd v. Chin Oi Ching: Unenforceability of Loan Agreement due to Unlicensed Moneylending 15 Sep 2024 Mface Pte Ltd (Claimant)Lost	15 Sep 2024	Mface Pte Ltd (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; Mface to pay costs fixed at $80,000 and specified disbursements to Chin. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Allianz Capital Partners GmbH v Goh Andress: Extended Fiona Trust Principle & Jurisdiction Clauses 07 May 2023 Andress Goh (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	07 May 2023	Andress Goh (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed. Costs awarded to the Appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Yihua Lifestyle v HTL International: Judicial Management & Discretion of Judicial Managers 07 Sep 2021 HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	07 Sep 2021	HTL International Holdings Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	Ong Heng Chuan v Ong Teck Chuan: Minority Oppression, De Facto & Shadow Directors, Company Accounts 29 Jul 2020 Ong Heng Chuan (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jul 2020	Ong Heng Chuan (Plaintiff): Claims DismissedPlaintiff's claims against the defendants were dismissed, and he was ordered to pay costs. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Jian Li Investments v Healthstats: Derivative Action for Trade Secret Mismanagement 19 Feb 2019 Chua Ngak Hwee (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Feb 2019	Chua Ngak Hwee (Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for leave to commence the derivative action is dismissed.
7	Pars Ram Brothers v ANZ: Distribution of Assets in Winding Up 15 Mar 2018 Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff)Won	15 Mar 2018	Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application grantedApplication under s 310(1)(a) of the Companies Act granted; the court determined that the rolling charge method should be used in respect of sales proceeds for all of the Disputed Categories. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore)
8	Pars Ram Brothers v ANZ Bank: Commingled Goods, Security Interests & Trust Receipts 01 Mar 2017 Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff)Neutral	01 Mar 2017	Pars Ram Brothers (Pte) Ltd (in creditors’ voluntary liquidation) (Plaintiff): Application for determination of distribution of sale proceedsThe liquidators sought a determination from the court regarding the distribution of sale proceeds from commingled pepper stock. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	BMD v Public Prosecutor: Rape & Sexual Assault of Intellectually Disabled Victim 13 Jan 2016 BMD (Appellant)Lost	13 Jan 2016	BMD (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against conviction and sentence dismissed.
10	Law Society v Yap Bock Heng: Disciplinary Proceedings for Improper Loan & Accounting Violations 24 Sep 2014 Law Society of Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	24 Sep 2014	Law Society of Singapore (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Law Society; Respondent suspended from practice for a total of five years (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd: Application to Appeal Mareva Injunction Decision 05 May 2014 PSONS Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	05 May 2014	PSONS Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application for leave to appeal dismissedThe plaintiff's application for leave to appeal was dismissed.
12	PSONS Ltd v UPF Holding Pte Ltd: Setting Aside Mareva Injunction for Lack of Clean Hands 30 Mar 2014 PSONS Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	30 Mar 2014	PSONS Ltd (Plaintiff): Injunction Set AsideThe Mareva injunction against the defendants was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	OMG Holdings v Pos Ad: Royalty Payments & Restraint of Trade in Sub-Licensing Agreement 19 Jul 2012 OMG Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant)Partial	19 Jul 2012	OMG Holdings Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed only in respect of the refund of royalties paid during the period between 22 April 1999 and 1 July 2002. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Rainforest Trading Ltd v State Bank of India: Enforceability of Equitable Mortgage and Conversion of Originating Summons 20 Mar 2012 State Bank of India Singapore (Respondent)Won	20 Mar 2012	State Bank of India Singapore (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.
15	Rabobank v Jurong Technologies: Unfair Preference Claim under Companies Act 15 Sep 2011 Jurong Technologies Industrial Corp Ltd (under judicial management) (Respondent)Won	15 Sep 2011	Jurong Technologies Industrial Corp Ltd (under judicial management) (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe court upheld the decision to set aside the payment of US$2,775,149.37 as an unfair preference.
16	DBS Bank v Tam Chee Chong: Unfair Preference & Judicial Management 15 Sep 2011 Tam Chee Chong and another (judicial managers of Jurong Hi-Tech Industries Pte Ltd (under judicial management)) (Respondent)Won	15 Sep 2011	Tam Chee Chong and another (judicial managers of Jurong Hi-Tech Industries Pte Ltd (under judicial management)) (Respondent): Judgment for RespondentThe appeal by DBS Bank Ltd was dismissed, affirming the decision in favor of the judicial managers.
17	SBI Singapore v Rainforest Trading: Enforcement of Share Pledge & Fraud Allegations 03 Aug 2011 State Bank of India Singapore (Plaintiff)Won	03 Aug 2011	State Bank of India Singapore (Plaintiff): Declarations GrantedDeclarations granted that an event of default occurred and SBI SG is entitled to enforce its security over the Pledged Shares, subject to the provisions of the eSys Articles of Association. The court also directed a valuation of the Pledged Shares be conducted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
18	Tam Chee Chong v DBS Bank: Unfair Preference in Judicial Management 17 Nov 2010 Keoy Soo Earn (Plaintiff)Won	17 Nov 2010	Keoy Soo Earn (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; the defendant shall pay JHTI the total net sale proceeds received from the disposal of the MAP Shares (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Kong Swee Eng v Rolles Rudolf Jurgen August: Sale of Shares, Overreaching, and Frustration 11 Oct 2010 Rolles Rudolf Jurgen August (Defendant)Won	11 Oct 2010	Rolles Rudolf Jurgen August (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment for the defendant on the counterclaim; the plaintiff is to pay $2,884,000 to the defendant against the transfer of the Shares, with interest at 5.33% per annum from 14 August 2009 to the date of judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	ING Belgium NV v Projector SA: Winding Up of Foreign Company in Singapore 11 Dec 2008 ING Belgium NV (Applicant)Won	11 Dec 2008	ING Belgium NV (Applicant): Application grantedApplication to wind up Projector SA was granted.
21	Lim Quee Choo v David Rasif: Setting Aside Substituted Service & Default Judgment in Negligence Suit 09 Mar 2008 David Tan Hock Boon (Defendant, Applicant)Won	09 Mar 2008	David Tan Hock Boon (Defendant, Applicant): Application allowedOrder for substituted service and all subsequent proceedings set aside.
22	Multiplex Constructions v Sintal: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration for Delay Damages 02 Mar 2005 Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Appellant)Partial	02 Mar 2005	Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, stay granted for interim certificates 28, 29, and 30. No stay for interim certificate 27. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Malayan Banking Bhd v Lauw Wisanggeni: Enforcement of Deed of Undertaking & Consideration in Contract Law 14 Sep 2003 Malayan Banking Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	14 Sep 2003	Malayan Banking Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; Lauw is required to purchase from the bank all or part of the 30 million shares in UFS charged by E-Info to the bank at the price of $0.17 per share and the bank is entitled to rely on other rights conferred as a result of the execution of the Deed of Undertaking. Costs awarded to MBB. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24	WSG Nimbus v Board of Control for Cricket: International Arbitration, Anti-Suit Injunction, and Issue Estoppel 12 May 2002 Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka (Defendant)Lost	12 May 2002	Board of Control for Cricket in Sri Lanka (Defendant): Application to set aside anti-suit injunction dismissedThe court dismissed the defendant's application to set aside the anti-suit injunction.
25	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Breach of Contract & Proof of Debt in Liquidation 05 Jul 2001 Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent)Won	05 Jul 2001	Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Singapore Pte Ltd (in liquidation) (Respondent): Application DismissedThomson Plaza's application to recover damages for breach of contract was dismissed.
26	Thomson Plaza v Yaohan Liquidators: Appeal Timing & Further Arguments 20 Jun 2001 The Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	20 Jun 2001	The Liquidators of Yaohan Department Store Pte Ltd (Respondent): Motion dismissedMotion to strike out notice of appeal was dismissed.