Prakash Pillai

Prakash Pillai is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 33 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and arbitration. Their track record shows a 44.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 12 complex cases, representing 36% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Prakash Pillai has demonstrated expertise across 168 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice AreaCase Volume
Contract Law25 cases
Breach of Contract14 cases
Evidence9 cases
Civil Practice9 cases
Civil Procedure8 cases
Arbitration8 cases
Estoppel8 cases
Commercial Disputes7 cases
Injunctions5 cases
Evidence Law5 cases
Misrepresentation5 cases
Setting aside4 cases
Recourse against award4 cases
Costs4 cases
Civil Litigation4 cases
Company Law4 cases
International Commercial Arbitration4 cases
Property Law3 cases
Contempt of Court3 cases
Natural justice3 cases
Duty of Candour3 cases
Torts3 cases
Unjust Enrichment3 cases
Jurisdiction3 cases
Commercial Law3 cases
Contractual terms3 cases
Administrative Law2 cases
Summary Judgment2 cases
Contractual Interpretation2 cases
Banking and Finance2 cases
Abuse of Process2 cases
Amendments2 cases
Running Account2 cases
Insurance Bad Faith2 cases
Anti-suit injunction2 cases
Restitution2 cases
Fiduciary Duties2 cases
Fraud and Deceit2 cases
Mistake2 cases
Breach of Confidence2 cases
Defamation2 cases
Offer to Settle2 cases
Debt Recovery2 cases
Damages2 cases
Contracts2 cases
Personal Injury2 cases
Ancillary disclosure order2 cases
Shareholders Agreement2 cases
Summary Judgement2 cases
Striking out2 cases
Waiver1 cases
Kompetenz-Kompetenz1 cases
Settlement Agreement1 cases
Discovery of documents1 cases
Limitation1 cases
Change of position1 cases
Garnishee Proceedings1 cases
Legal Profession Act1 cases
Judgments and Orders1 cases
Rescission1 cases
Enforcement of Arbitral Awards1 cases
Time-Fixing Order1 cases
Setting Aside Arbitral Award1 cases
Strata Titles1 cases
Statutory Interpretation1 cases
Restraint of Trade1 cases
Duty to Account1 cases
Submission to Jurisdiction1 cases
Total failure of consideration1 cases
Crossclaims1 cases
Disclosure of documents1 cases
Peremptory orders1 cases
Transnational issue estoppel1 cases
Show cause action1 cases
Interpretation of contractual terms1 cases
Breach of Promise1 cases
Setting aside default judgment1 cases
Stay of court proceedings1 cases
Disputes1 cases
Remoteness of damage1 cases
Lump sum contract1 cases
Rules of construction1 cases
Performance of Contract1 cases
Variation1 cases
Interest1 cases
Early Dismissal1 cases
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act1 cases
Quia timet injunction1 cases
Protection of contractual rights1 cases
Restraint of wrongs1 cases
Rules of court1 cases
Non-compliance1 cases
Quantum of costs1 cases
Interpleader1 cases
Affidavits1 cases
Hearing Protocol1 cases
Caveats1 cases
Unpaid Vendor's Lien1 cases
Absence of consideration1 cases
False Imprisonment1 cases
Breach of Contractual Terms1 cases
Mortgage Law1 cases
Non-disclosure1 cases
Best Efforts Clause1 cases
Guarantees and indemnities1 cases
Guarantor1 cases
Sham Contract1 cases
Inherent Power of the Court1 cases
Casino Law1 cases
Joint Venture Agreement1 cases
Defective Works1 cases
Securities Trading1 cases
Demeanor of Witnesses1 cases
Private Education Law1 cases
Mistake of Law1 cases
Compromise1 cases
Assumption of Risk1 cases
Tag-along Rights1 cases
Architect's Certificate1 cases
Assault1 cases
Bankruptcy1 cases
Business Law1 cases
Construction Law1 cases
Easements1 cases
Employment Law1 cases
Insurance1 cases
International Commercial Contracts1 cases
Land Law1 cases
Negligence1 cases
Performance Bonds1 cases
Powers of Attorney1 cases
Telecommunications Law1 cases
Trusts and Estates1 cases
Insolvency Law1 cases
Review1 cases
Inducement of Breach of Contract1 cases
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means1 cases
Ad Hoc Admission1 cases
Receivership1 cases
Transfer of Cases1 cases
Lack of proper notice1 cases
Infra petita1 cases
Admissibility of evidence1 cases
Similar fact evidence1 cases
Adverse inferences1 cases
Sham Agreements1 cases
Natural forum1 cases
Restraint of foreign proceedings1 cases
Comity1 cases
Vexatious and oppressive conduct1 cases
Illegality and public policy1 cases
Contractual discretions1 cases
Separability1 cases
Waiver of objections1 cases
Consent Orders1 cases
Malicious Falsehood1 cases
Service out of jurisdiction1 cases
Amendment of Pleadings1 cases
Contentious Business Agreements1 cases
Assessment of Legal Costs1 cases
Apparent bias1 cases
Foreign arbitral award1 cases
Breach of unless order1 cases
Production of documents1 cases
Civil Contempt1 cases
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards1 cases
International Arbitration Act1 cases
Pre-judgment interest1 cases

Law Firm Affiliations

Prakash Pillai has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 19 cases.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Prakash Pillai's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
10.5
Complex Cases
12 (36%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Dismissed13.0 parties avg
Lost1016.1 parties avg
Neutral34.0 parties avg
Partial63.0 parties avg
Won163.8 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
200022.0 parties avg
200126.7 parties avg
200243.6 parties avg
2004120.0 parties avg
2005220.0 parties avg
200614.0 parties avg
201123.7 parties avg
201513.0 parties avg
201623.5 parties avg
201713.0 parties avg
201912.0 parties avg
202022.7 parties avg
202133.8 parties avg
202225.7 parties avg
202352.3 parties avg
202422.7 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Prakash Pillai's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Dismissed1(3%)
Lost10(28%)
Neutral3(8%)
Partial6(17%)
Won16(44%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD62,854.6320 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20002
11
20012
2
20025
14
20041
1
20052
2
20062
11
20112
11
20151
1
20162
11
20171
1
20191
1
20202
11
20213
3
20222
11
20235
221
20243
111

Case History

Displaying all 33 cases

Case
20 May 2024
DBL (Appellant)Lost
26 Mar 2024
Deepak Mishra (Claimant)Neutral
26 Nov 2023
Nimisha Pandey (Claimant, Defendant in Counterclaim)Partial
08 Nov 2023
Stichting Chemical Distribution Institute (Defendant)Won
21 Sep 2023
DBL (Claimant)Lost
03 May 2023
Nimisha Pandey (Claimant)Partial
01 Feb 2023
Thong Soon Seng (Plaintiff)Lost
01 Dec 2022
CUH (Respondent)Won
17 Apr 2022
CXA Insurance Brokers Singapore Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost
23 Dec 2021
Gaja Trustee Company Private Limited (Defendant)Won
20 Sep 2021
Ameet Nalin Parikh (Respondent, Plaintiff)Won
01 Mar 2021
Ameet Nalin Parikh (Plaintiff)Won
15 Oct 2020
Simplot India Foods Pvt Ltd (Defendant, Applicant)Won
05 Jul 2020
ED&F Man Capital Markets Limited (Appellant)Lost
28 Aug 2019
ED&F Man Capital Markets Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial
08 Mar 2017
Goel Adesh Kumar (Plaintiff)Partial
12 Jul 2016
JVL AGRO INDUSTRIES LTD (Plaintiff, Applicant)Won
21 Jan 2016
SIC COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND TECHNOLOGY PTE LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS SIC EDUCATION GROUP PTE LTD) (Appellant, Plaintiff)Partial
03 Nov 2015
Goel Adesh Kumar (Plaintiff)Partial
05 Jul 2011
Chainford Investment Ltd (Plaintiff)Dismissed
17 May 2011
SIC College of Business and Technology Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost
27 Jul 2006
PT Vandashima Indonesia (Plaintiff)Neutral
09 Nov 2005
Wong Loong Tat (Plaintiff)Lost
27 Sep 2005
Tan Lian Seng (Plaintiff)Lost
16 Nov 2004
Tan Lian Seng (Plaintiff)Lost
08 Dec 2002
Don Ho Mun-Tuke (Defendant)Won
07 Jul 2002
SINGAPORE TELECOMMUNICATIONS LIMITED (Defendant)Neutral
29 May 2002
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant)Won
01 May 2002
Singapore Telecommunications Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won
18 Nov 2001
CEF (Singapore) Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won
29 Jun 2001
Frontfield Investment Holding (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff)Won
27 Nov 2000
Soil-Build (Pte) Ltd (Plaintiff, Appellant)Won
17 Sep 2000
Pacific Century Regional Developments Limited (Defendant)Lost