Raymond Chan

Raymond Chan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and building and construction contracts. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Raymond Chan has demonstrated expertise across 28 primary practice areas, with significant experience in construction law and contract law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Construction Law	9 cases	15% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	9 cases	15% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 15% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	6 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Construction Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Factoring	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cannabis Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Raymond Chan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Raymond Chan has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Chan Neo LLP	6 cases	60% of cases	Far East Square v Yau Lee Construction: SOPA & SIA Contract - Final Certificate Effect(May 2019) Yau Lee Construction v Far East Square: SOPA Dispute over Payment Claim Validity and Adjudicator's Jurisdiction(Nov 2018) Yau Lee Construction v. Far East Square: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration of Construction Dispute(Jul 2018)
Chan Tan LLC	2 cases	20% of cases	LK Ang Construction v Chubb Singapore: Offer to Settle & Cost Implications(Oct 2003) L.K. Ang Construction v Chubb Singapore: Sub-Contract Formation & Defamation(Dec 2002)
ChanTan LLC	1 cases	10% of cases	Steel Industries v Deenn Engineering: Architect's Certificate, Waiver, and 'Pay When Paid' Clause in Construction Sub-Contract(Aug 2003)
Chan Tan & Partners	1 cases	10% of cases	L & W Building Construction v King Wah Construction: Defective Works Dispute(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Raymond Chan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	20%
Stayed	12.0 parties avg	2.0	10%
Won	52.2 parties avg	2.2	50%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Raymond Chan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(20%)	20%
Partial	2(20%)	20%
Stayed	1(10%)	10%
Won	5(50%)	50%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,684,107.93	780,684.656 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	3 12	Stayed: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 10 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Far East Square v Yau Lee Construction: SOPA & SIA Contract - Final Certificate Effect 15 May 2019 Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	15 May 2019	Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of the appeal and below.
2	Yau Lee Construction v Far East Square: SOPA Dispute over Payment Claim Validity and Adjudicator's Jurisdiction 26 Nov 2018 Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	26 Nov 2018	Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe developer's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed, and the sum of $2,276,284.68 was ordered to be paid out to the contractor. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Yau Lee Construction v. Far East Square: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration of Construction Dispute 16 Jul 2018 Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant, Respondent)Stayed	16 Jul 2018	Yau Lee Construction (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Applicant, Respondent): Stay Application GrantedStay of Plaintiff's claim granted, referring the dispute to arbitration.
4	Milan International v Cluny Development: Performance Bond & Building Contract Dispute 12 Feb 2018 Cluny Development Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	12 Feb 2018	Cluny Development Pte Ltd (Respondent): Applications dismissedCluny successfully defended against Milan's applications for an interim and final injunction and was awarded costs of $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Hyundai Engineering v International Elements: Interpretation of s 15(3)(b) of Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 07 Jul 2016 International Elements Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	07 Jul 2016	International Elements Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedAdjudicator determined that the defendant was entitled to its revised claim of $974,823.95 and the costs of the adjudication (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Thian Sung Construction v International Elements: Security of Payment Act & Factoring 16 Dec 2015 International Elements Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	16 Dec 2015	International Elements Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedThe plaintiff's application was dismissed and the amount of $1,407,574.46 that had been paid into court as security was released to the defendant. Costs of $8,000, including disbursements, were ordered in favour of the defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	LK Ang Construction v Chubb Singapore: Offer to Settle & Cost Implications 28 Oct 2003 LK Ang Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	28 Oct 2003	LK Ang Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Partial WinJudgment for the plaintiff on the libel claim; damages assessed at $15,000 with interest of $424.84. (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Steel Industries v Deenn Engineering: Architect's Certificate, Waiver, and 'Pay When Paid' Clause in Construction Sub-Contract 05 Aug 2003 Deenn Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	05 Aug 2003	Deenn Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Application allowedApplication to stay proceedings allowed; action stayed pending arbitration.
9	L.K. Ang Construction v Chubb Singapore: Sub-Contract Formation & Defamation 17 Dec 2002 LK Ang Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	17 Dec 2002	LK Ang Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Action succeeds on libel, fails on breach of contractThe plaintiff won the defamation claim, but lost the breach of contract claim. Damages for libel to be assessed by the registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	L & W Building Construction v King Wah Construction: Defective Works Dispute 22 Nov 2000 King Wah Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	22 Nov 2000	King Wah Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed, stay of proceedings ordered pending arbitration.