Renganathan Shankar

Renganathan Shankar is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2019. The lawyer has handled 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in negligence and contract law. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated expertise across 39 primary practice areas, with significant experience in negligence and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Negligence	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	7% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Education Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Testamentary Capacity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Rental Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Mutual Wills	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equipment Rental	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Motor accident	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Traffic Accident Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicle Insurance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Motor Vehicles (Third-Party Risks and Compensation) Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
School Bullying	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cyberbullying	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Hire-Purchase Agreement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Exaggerated Injuries	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Renganathan Shankar has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Renganathan Shankar has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Gabriel Law Corporation	5 cases	83% of cases	Lim Choo Eng v Koh Siew Eng: Misrepresentation Act, Restitution, and Unjust Enrichment in Land Investment Dispute(Aug 2019) Asnah Bte Ab Rahman v Li Jianlin: Contributory Negligence & Pedestrian Safety at Signalised Crossings(Mar 2016) AYW v AYX: Negligence Claim for School Bullying - Duty of Care Analysis(Dec 2015)
Shankar, Nandwani & Partners	1 cases	17% of cases	Teo Chin Leong Thomson v Fuji Xerox: Breach of Photocopier Rental Agreement Dispute(Jun 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Renganathan Shankar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.6
Complex Cases: 1 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.6 parties avg	2.6	100%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2016	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Renganathan Shankar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(100%)	100%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lim Choo Eng v Koh Siew Eng: Misrepresentation Act, Restitution, and Unjust Enrichment in Land Investment Dispute 22 Aug 2019 Lim Choo Eng (Plaintiff)Lost	22 Aug 2019	Lim Choo Eng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe plaintiff's claim for misrepresentation and unjust enrichment was dismissed due to deficiencies in the pleadings.
2	Asnah Bte Ab Rahman v Li Jianlin: Contributory Negligence & Pedestrian Safety at Signalised Crossings 16 Mar 2016 Li Jianlin (Respondent)Lost	16 Mar 2016	Li Jianlin (Respondent): Damages ReducedDamages reduced by 15% due to contributory negligence. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	AYW v AYX: Negligence Claim for School Bullying - Duty of Care Analysis 06 Dec 2015 AYW (Plaintiff, Appellant)Lost	06 Dec 2015	AYW (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal DismissedPlaintiff's appeal was dismissed, and the entire statement of claim was struck out. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Zhu Shan Fu v China Construction Builders: Assessment of Damages for Workplace Injury 14 Mar 2012 Zhu Shan Fu (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	14 Mar 2012	Zhu Shan Fu (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; no increase in damages awarded.
5	Rajaratnam Kumar v Estate of Rajaratnam Saravana Muthu: Validity of Mutual Wills Dispute 25 May 2010 Rajaratnam Kumar (alias Rajaratnam Vairamuthu) (Plaintiff)Lost	25 May 2010	Rajaratnam Kumar (alias Rajaratnam Vairamuthu) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim to set aside the fourth wills was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Teo Chin Leong Thomson v Fuji Xerox: Breach of Photocopier Rental Agreement Dispute 29 Jun 2000 Woo Poh Choon Doreen trading as Thomson Copy Service (Plaintiff)Lost	29 Jun 2000	Woo Poh Choon Doreen trading as Thomson Copy Service (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; judgment for the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.