S Thulasidas

S Thulasidas is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2002 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 12 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and family law. Their track record shows a 42.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 3 complex cases, representing 25% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S Thulasidas has demonstrated expertise across 37 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	12% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 12% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	6 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	5 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Family Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Matrimonial Property	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tort of Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Subcontracting	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S Thulasidas has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S Thulasidas has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 9 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ling Das & Partners	9 cases	75% of cases	Keng & Keong Construction v Swee Hong Engineering: Subcontract Dispute over Termination and Damages(Mar 2011) Zac. T Engineering v GTMS Construction: Construction Subcontract Dispute over Payment and Repudiation(Mar 2011) Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John: Application to Convert Originating Summons to Writ of Summons Dismissed(May 2009)
Ling Das and Partners	3 cases	25% of cases	Tan Sue-Ann Melissa v Lim Siang Bok Dennis: Appeal to Vary Consent Order for Wife's Maintenance(Jun 2004) Samwoh Resources v Lee Ah Poh: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages Assessment(Apr 2004) Tan Sue-Ann Melissa v Lim Siang Bok Dennis: Appeal for Cessation of Spousal Maintenance(Nov 2003)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S Thulasidas's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.7
Complex Cases: 3 (25%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	42.3 parties avg	2.3	33%
Partial	32.0 parties avg	2.0	25%
Won	53.4 parties avg	3.4	42%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2004	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S Thulasidas's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(33%)	33%
Partial	3(25%)	25%
Won	5(42%)	42%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	457,042.83	50,782.549 cases	9

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 211	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2004	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2007	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 12 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Keng & Keong Construction v Swee Hong Engineering: Subcontract Dispute over Termination and Damages 30 Mar 2011 Swee Hong Engineering Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	30 Mar 2011	Swee Hong Engineering Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim allowed in partCounterclaim for repudiatory breach of contract allowed; nominal damages of $100 awarded (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Zac. T Engineering v GTMS Construction: Construction Subcontract Dispute over Payment and Repudiation 21 Mar 2011 GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	21 Mar 2011	GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant for $265,358.83 (including GST) on its counterclaim. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John: Application to Convert Originating Summons to Writ of Summons Dismissed 26 May 2009 Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	26 May 2009	Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantCosts of $1,300 awarded to the second defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung John: Application to Compel Police Investigation Dismissed 24 Mar 2009 Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	24 Mar 2009	Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs AwardedPlaintiffs ordered to pay costs to the defendant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Anwar Siraj v Teo Hee Lai: Stay of Proceedings in Favor of Arbitration 27 Feb 2007 Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent)Won	27 Feb 2007	Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant, Respondent): Stay of Proceedings GrantedStay of proceedings granted in favour of arbitration (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Tan Sue-Ann Melissa v Lim Siang Bok Dennis: Appeal to Vary Consent Order for Wife's Maintenance 27 Jun 2004 Lim Siang Bok Dennis (Respondent)Partial	27 Jun 2004	Lim Siang Bok Dennis (Respondent): Appeal allowed in partThe respondent's appeal was allowed in part in the High Court, and the maintenance payable was reduced from $2,000 to $1,100 a month. This decision was upheld by the Court of Appeal.
7	Samwoh Resources v Lee Ah Poh: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Damages Assessment 26 Apr 2004 Lee Ah Poh (Defendant)Lost	26 Apr 2004	Lee Ah Poh (Defendant): Damages assessed againstDamages assessed against the defendant in the amount of $190,284 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Tan Sue-Ann Melissa v Lim Siang Bok Dennis: Appeal for Cessation of Spousal Maintenance 26 Nov 2003 Tan Sue-Ann Melissa (m.w.) (Appellant, Respondent)Partial	26 Nov 2003	Tan Sue-Ann Melissa (m.w.) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, reducing the maintenance amount. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	Samwoh Resources v Lee Ah Poh: Fraudulent Misrepresentation in Equipment Purchase for Quarry Project 30 Mar 2003 Lee Ah Poh (Defendant)Lost	30 Mar 2003	Lee Ah Poh (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Anwar Siraj v Ting Kang Chung: Challenge to Arbitrator's Impartiality and Competence in Construction Dispute 23 Mar 2003 Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	23 Mar 2003	Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Costs AwardedApplicants ordered to pay the costs of this application to the Second Respondent. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Ng Huat Engineering v Jurong Town Corp: Extension of Time to Appeal Arbitration Award 26 Jan 2003 Ng Huat Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant)Lost	26 Jan 2003	Ng Huat Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Applicant): Application DismissedThe application for an extension of time to apply for leave to appeal was dismissed.
12	Anwar Siraj v Teo Hee Lai: Unconscionability in Performance Bond Call 24 Nov 2002 Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	24 Nov 2002	Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The injunction restraining the appellants from making a demand under the performance bond was set aside. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.