Samuel Navindran

Samuel Navindran is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2021 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in bankruptcy and performance bond. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Samuel Navindran has demonstrated expertise across 42 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	5 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	4 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice36% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced67% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Corporate Insolvency	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Liquidated Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition of foreign insolvency proceedings	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Deed Interpretation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Trade Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
No-Action Clause	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
United Nations Commission on International Trade Law Model Law on International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement and Compromise	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy Chapter 11	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Cross-Border Insolvency	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Samuel Navindran has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Samuel Navindran has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 5 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
WongPartnership LLP	5 cases	100% of cases	Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract(Aug 2023) Lim How Teck v Laguna National: Winding Up Application & No-Action Clause Dispute(Feb 2023) Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process(Jan 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Samuel Navindran's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.2
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.5 parties avg	2.5	40%
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	20%
Won	21.5 parties avg	1.5	40%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2021	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2025	11.0 parties avg	1.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Samuel Navindran's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40%)	40%
Partial	1(20%)	20%
Won	2(40%)	40%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Terraform Labs: Recognition of US Chapter 11 Liquidation Plan under SG Model Law 20 Feb 2025 Terraform Labs Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	20 Feb 2025	Terraform Labs Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application GrantedReliefs granted under Article 21(1) of the SG Model Law, allowing administration of assets and preventing new legal actions (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chian Teck Realty v SDK Consortium: Performance Bond Dispute in Construction Contract 03 Aug 2023 Chian Teck Realty Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	03 Aug 2023	Chian Teck Realty Pte Ltd (Applicant): PartialOrder for second respondent to be restrained from making payment to first respondent pursuant to the claim on the bond made on 29 July 2022. First respondent is also restrained from claiming or directing second respondent to make said payment.
3	Lim How Teck v Laguna National: Winding Up Application & No-Action Clause Dispute 12 Feb 2023 Lim How Teck (Claimant, Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2023	Lim How Teck (Claimant, Defendant): Application grantedLim’s application in CWU 78 is granted. Costs of the proceedings be taxed, if not agreed or fixed, and be paid to Lim out of the assets of the Company. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Goldbell Engineering v Etiqa Insurance and Range Construction: Performance Bond Dispute and Abuse of Process 04 Jan 2022 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party, Plaintiff)Lost	04 Jan 2022	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Third Party, Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication by Range Construction Pte Ltd for injunctions against Goldbell and Etiqa is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Range Construction v Goldbell Engineering: SOPA & Set-Off for Liquidated Damages 08 Apr 2021 Range Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant)Lost	08 Apr 2021	Range Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Applicant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs.