Singa Retnam

Singa Retnam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 27 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 9 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and misuse of drugs act. Their track record shows a 10.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 37% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Singa Retnam has demonstrated expertise across 79 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	19 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 19 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	14 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 14 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	13 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	11 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	10 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offences	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abetment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tenancy Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Money and moneylenders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Murder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corruption, Drug Trafficking and Other Serious Crimes (Confiscation of Benefits) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unlawful assembly	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misappropriation of Funds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inadequate Legal Assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deficient Legal Services	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Common intention	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Solicitor-client relationship	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal moneylending	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees and indemnities	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Taxation of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Voluntariness of Statements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Offences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cooperative Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Illegal gratification	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mixed statement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Landlord and Tenant Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
White Collar Crime	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Knowing Receipt	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Culpable Homicide	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Singa Retnam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Singa Retnam has been affiliated with 9 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 8 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kertar & Co	8 cases	30% of cases	Panweld Trading v Yong Kheng Leong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Limitation Act(Mar 2012) Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security: Defamation Retrial Ordered, Costs Review(Mar 2012) Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case(Mar 2011)
I.R.B Law LLP	6 cases	22% of cases	Imran v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, Wilful Blindness, Misuse of Drugs Act(Dec 2020) GA Machinery v Yue Xiang: Illegal Moneylending & Enforceability of Loan Agreements(Dec 2020) Public Prosecutor v Raj Kumar: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2020)
Aziz Tayabali & Associates	5 cases	19% of cases	PP v Suthakar J Raman: Drug Trafficking - Common Intention under Misuse of Drugs Act(Jun 2017) PP v Ranjit Singh Gill: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act(Oct 2016) Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act(Feb 2015)
Singa Retnam, Kurup & Associates	3 cases	11% of cases	PP v Yeow Beng Chye: Corruption, Illegal Gratification, Witness Testimony(Apr 2003) Public Prosecutor v Tay Teik Chai Robson: Culpable Homicide and Common Intention(Mar 2003) Public Prosecutor v Ramis A/L Muniandy: Drug Trafficking - Cannabis(Feb 2001)
I R B Law LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Prince Restaurant v Kosma Holdings: Breach of Tenancy Agreement Dispute(Oct 2017)
M/s IRB Law LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	PP v Chong Chee Boon Kenneth: Abetment of Rash Act Causing Death in SCDF Kolam Ritual(Jul 2021)
instructed counsel	1 cases	4% of cases	Tommy Choo v Kuntjoro Wibawa: Taxation of Costs Dispute over Legal Fees and Oral Agreement(Sep 2015)
Independent Practitioner	1 cases	4% of cases	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance(Nov 2022)
Kerta & Co	1 cases	4% of cases	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation(Mar 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Singa Retnam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.6
Complex Cases: 10 (37%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	16.0 parties avg	6.0	4%
Lost	203.3 parties avg	3.3	74%
Other	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Partial	44.0 parties avg	4.0	15%
Won	34.2 parties avg	4.2	11%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2009	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2010	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2011	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2012	34.7 parties avg	4.7
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2017	32.3 parties avg	2.3
2019	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2020	34.4 parties avg	4.4
2021	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2022	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Singa Retnam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(3%)	3%
Lost	20(69%)	69%
Other	1(3%)	3%
Partial	4(14%)	14%
Won	3(10%)	10%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,436,738.40	487,347.685 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	5 131	Dismissed: 1 cases (20.0%) Lost: 3 cases (60.0%) Partial: 1 cases (20.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Other: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 27 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Public Prosecutor v Haridass: Conspiracy to Traffic Diamorphine & Inadequate Legal Assistance 15 Nov 2022 Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant)Other	15 Nov 2022	Haridass s/o Mohan (Defendant): Application AllowedAccused allowed to recall Prosecution witnesses and give further evidence.
2	PP v Chong Chee Boon Kenneth: Abetment of Rash Act Causing Death in SCDF Kolam Ritual 22 Jul 2021 Nazhan bin Mohamed Nazi (Respondent, Appellant)Lost	22 Jul 2021	Nazhan bin Mohamed Nazi (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal DismissedSWO Nazhan’s appeal was dismissed.
3	Imran v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, Wilful Blindness, Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Dec 2020 Pragas Krissamy (Appellant)Won	17 Dec 2020	Pragas Krissamy (Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe appeal on the charge against Pragas was allowed and he was acquitted of this charge.
4	GA Machinery v Yue Xiang: Illegal Moneylending & Enforceability of Loan Agreements 02 Dec 2020 Tay Jyh Chau (Zheng Zhichao) (Defendant)Won	02 Dec 2020	Tay Jyh Chau (Zheng Zhichao) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe court found in favor of the defendant, dismissing the plaintiffs' claim.
5	Public Prosecutor v Raj Kumar: Trafficking Cannabis under Misuse of Drugs Act 14 Jun 2020 Ramadass Punnusamy (Defendant)Lost	14 Jun 2020	Ramadass Punnusamy (Defendant): ConvictionRamadass Punnusamy was convicted of trafficking in not less than 1,875.8g of cannabis and sentenced to life imprisonment and caning of not less than 15 strokes.
6	PP v Imran, Pragas, Tamil: Drug Trafficking Conspiracy under Misuse of Drugs Act 01 Jul 2019 Pragas Krissamy (Defendant)Lost	01 Jul 2019	Pragas Krissamy (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted under s 5(1)(a) of the MDA read with s 34 of the Penal Code for trafficking in not less than 19.42g of diamorphine and sentenced to death.
7	Public Prosecutor v Aishamudin: Trafficking Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 20 Jan 2019 Roszaidi bin Osman (Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2019	Roszaidi bin Osman (Defendant): Guilty as chargedRoszaidi was found guilty of trafficking diamorphine.
8	PP v Saravanan Chandaram: Importation of Cannabis & Cannabis Mixture under Misuse of Drugs Act 22 Oct 2017 Saravanan Chandaram (Defendant)Lost	22 Oct 2017	Saravanan Chandaram (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was convicted on two charges of importing cannabis and cannabis mixture.
9	Prince Restaurant v Kosma Holdings: Breach of Tenancy Agreement Dispute 03 Oct 2017 Prince Restaurant Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	03 Oct 2017	Prince Restaurant Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent fixed at $12,000 (inclusive of disbursements). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	PP v Suthakar J Raman: Drug Trafficking - Common Intention under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jun 2017 Prabu N Pathmanathan (Defendant)Lost	27 Jun 2017	Prabu N Pathmanathan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedThe court found the accused guilty as charged.
11	PP v Ranjit Singh Gill: Trafficking of Diamorphine under Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Oct 2016 Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh (Defendant)Partial	05 Oct 2016	Ranjit Singh Gill Menjeet Singh (Defendant): Partial LossConvicted of drug trafficking but avoided the death penalty, receiving life imprisonment and caning instead.
12	Tommy Choo v Kuntjoro Wibawa: Taxation of Costs Dispute over Legal Fees and Oral Agreement 13 Sep 2015 Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners (Applicant, Respondent)Lost	13 Sep 2015	Tommy Choo Mark Go & Partners (Applicant, Respondent): Application DismissedTCMGP’s application in SUM 3317 was dismissed.
13	Public Prosecutor v V Shanmugam: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, and Application of Misuse of Drugs Act 02 Feb 2015 V Shanmugam a/l Veloo (Defendant)Partial	02 Feb 2015	V Shanmugam a/l Veloo (Defendant): PartialConvicted of drug trafficking but spared the death penalty due to substantive assistance to CNB; sentenced to life imprisonment and caning.
14	Public Prosecutor v Mahesvaran: Drug Importation & Sentencing 16 Sep 2014 Mahesvaran a/l Sivalingam (Defendant)Lost	16 Sep 2014	Mahesvaran a/l Sivalingam (Defendant): Life Imprisonment and 15 Strokes of the CaneAccused sentenced to life imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
15	Yong Kheng Leong v Panweld Trading: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Misappropriation of Funds 21 Oct 2012 Lim Ai Cheng (Appellant)Lost	21 Oct 2012	Lim Ai Cheng (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; Lim Ai Cheng liable for $338,410 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	Panweld Trading v Yong Kheng Leong: Breach of Fiduciary Duty & Limitation Act 18 Mar 2012 Yong June Meng Gary (Defendant)Dismissed	18 Mar 2012	Yong June Meng Gary (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim against the 3rd defendant was dropped.
17	Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security: Defamation Retrial Ordered, Costs Review 05 Mar 2012 Basil Anthony Herman (Applicant, Defendant)Lost	05 Mar 2012	Basil Anthony Herman (Applicant, Defendant): Application dismissedApplication for review of taxed costs was dismissed.
18	Public Prosecutor v Phuthita Somchit: Trafficking Diamorphine Conspiracy Case 24 Mar 2011 Quek Hock Lye (Defendant)Lost	24 Mar 2011	Quek Hock Lye (Defendant): ConvictedConvicted of trafficking diamorphine and sentenced to death.
19	Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security: Defamation, Wrongful Dismissal & Subpoena Dispute 06 Apr 2010 Basil Anthony Herman (Appellant)Partial	06 Apr 2010	Basil Anthony Herman (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartDecision of the Judge set aside and a new trial ordered on Basil's defences and his counterclaim. Basil was awarded the costs of the appeal and half of his costs for the trial below on a standard basis.
20	PP v Sufian bin Nordin: Culpable Homicide, Unlawful Assembly, and Penal Code Interpretation 09 Mar 2010 Muhammad Syukur Bin Mohamed Salleh (Defendant)Lost	09 Mar 2010	Muhammad Syukur Bin Mohamed Salleh (Defendant): Imprisonment and CaningSentenced to 12 years’ imprisonment and ten strokes of the cane.
21	Premier Security v Herman: Defamation Claim over Security Services 23 Sep 2009 Basil Anthony Herman (Defendant)Lost	23 Sep 2009	Basil Anthony Herman (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim was dismissed with costs.
22	PP v Noorazni bin Ithnin: Trafficking of Diamorphine (Heroin) under the Misuse of Drugs Act 22 Mar 2009 Noorazni bin Ithnin (Defendant)Lost	22 Mar 2009	Noorazni bin Ithnin (Defendant): ConvictedThe Accused was convicted and sentenced to suffer the mandatory death penalty.
23	Ung Yoke Hooi v Attorney-General: Application for Release of Bank Accounts under Criminal Procedure Code 20 Aug 2008 Ung Yoke Hooi (Applicant)Lost	20 Aug 2008	Ung Yoke Hooi (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication for leave to apply for a mandatory order was refused. Originating summons dismissed with costs.
24	PP v Daniel Vijay: Joint Murder Charge for Robbery Resulting in Death 27 Jul 2008 Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan (Defendant)Lost	27 Jul 2008	Daniel Vijay s/o Katherasan (Defendant): Guilty as chargedConvicted and passed the mandatory death sentence.
25	PP v Yeow Beng Chye: Corruption, Illegal Gratification, Witness Testimony 22 Apr 2003 Yeow Beng Chye (Respondent)Won	22 Apr 2003	Yeow Beng Chye (Respondent): Acquittal UpheldYeow Beng Chye's acquittal on corruption charges was upheld.
26	Public Prosecutor v Tay Teik Chai Robson: Culpable Homicide and Common Intention 02 Mar 2003 Tay Teik Chai Robson (Defendant)Lost	02 Mar 2003	Tay Teik Chai Robson (Defendant): ConvictedAccused was convicted of culpable homicide not amounting to murder and sentenced to nine years imprisonment and 12 strokes of the cane.
27	Public Prosecutor v Ramis A/L Muniandy: Drug Trafficking - Cannabis 22 Feb 2001 Ramis a/l Muniandy (Defendant)Lost	22 Feb 2001	Ramis a/l Muniandy (Defendant): Sentenced to deathThe accused was sentenced to death.