Tan Sih Si

Tan Sih Si is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in arbitration and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 86.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 1 complex case, representing 14% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Sih Si has demonstrated expertise across 43 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and arbitration.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Foreign Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Company Law	2 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Court Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Express Warranties	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Exclusion Clauses	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Collateral Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID)	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Permanent Court of Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Foreign Judgments	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Private International Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Sih Si has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Sih Si has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Drew & Napier LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt(Feb 2024) Affert Resources v Industries Chimiques: Extension of Time for Expert Affidavit on Senegalese Law(Oct 2023) Bharat Forge v Bombardier: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Aircraft Maintenance(Jul 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Sih Si's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 1 (14%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Won	63.3 parties avg	3.3	86%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	43.7 parties avg	3.7
2023	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Sih Si's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	6(86%)	86%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,582,645.48	316,529.105 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	4 4	Won: 4 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt 27 Feb 2024 Indorama Holdings BV (Respondent)Won	27 Feb 2024	Indorama Holdings BV (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application to order Indorama Holdings BV to pay the sum of US$17,007,263.60 to the applicant was dismissed.
2	Affert Resources v Industries Chimiques: Extension of Time for Expert Affidavit on Senegalese Law 25 Oct 2023 Indorama Holdings BV (Respondent)Partial	25 Oct 2023	Indorama Holdings BV (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in relation to the striking out of the 12th Affidavit of Mr Abuthahir.
3	Bharat Forge v Bombardier: Breach of Contract & Negligence in Aircraft Maintenance 28 Jul 2022 Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2022	Bombardier Aerospace Services Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favor of the defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
4	Sanum Investments v Government of Lao: Setting Aside & Enforcement of Arbitral Award 31 May 2022 Kelly Gass (Defendant, Respondent)Won	31 May 2022	Kelly Gass (Defendant, Respondent): Applications DismissedApplications to set aside and resist enforcement of the arbitral award were dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Lao Holdings NV v Government of the Lao PDR: Setting Aside ICSID & PCA Awards for Bribery & Corruption Allegations 12 Apr 2022 The Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Defendant)Won	12 Apr 2022	The Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic (Defendant): Applications dismissedThe applications to set aside the BIT Awards were dismissed, and the Government of the Lao People’s Democratic Republic was awarded costs of SGD 214,000 (this amount is net of the costs awarded to Lao Holdings NV for the Sealing Applications). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Thio Keng Thay v Sandy Island Pte Ltd: Damages for Breach of Sale and Purchase Agreement 30 Mar 2022 Thio Keng Thay (Plaintiff)Won	30 Mar 2022	Thio Keng Thay (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the sum of $1,308,645.48. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Recovery Vehicle 1 v Industries Chimiques: Service Out of Jurisdiction & Forum Conveniens 28 Oct 2020 Industries Chimiques du Senegal (Respondent, Appellant)Won	28 Oct 2020	Industries Chimiques du Senegal (Respondent, Appellant): Appeal AllowedICS's appeal in CA 32 was allowed, and RV1 was ordered to pay ICS costs of $60,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).