Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael

Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2020 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in contracts and equitable estoppel. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated expertise across 40 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and misrepresentation.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Equitable Estoppel	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letters of Credit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trade Finance	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Striking out	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Limitation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Failure of consideration	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bills of Lading Act	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Charitable trusts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Letter of Indemnity	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Admiralty and Maritime Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Charitable Giving	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Kenneth Tan Partnership	7 cases	100% of cases	Seatrium New Energy v HJ Shipbuilding: Contractual Terms, Warranties & Estoppel(Sep 2024) DFS v NUHS Fund Ltd: Lapse of Charitable Gift to Dissolved NUH Endowment Fund(Nov 2023) UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation(Oct 2022)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.1
Complex Cases: 0 (0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	29%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	14%
Won	42.3 parties avg	2.3	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Wee Kheng Kenneth Michael's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(29%)	29%
Partial	1(14%)	14%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	120,000.00	20,000.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seatrium New Energy v HJ Shipbuilding: Contractual Terms, Warranties & Estoppel 15 Sep 2024 HJ Shipbuilding & Construction Co, Ltd (formerly known as Hanjin Heavy Industries and Construction Co Ltd) (Respondent)Won	15 Sep 2024	HJ Shipbuilding & Construction Co, Ltd (formerly known as Hanjin Heavy Industries and Construction Co Ltd) (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent in the sum of S$60,000 including disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	DFS v NUHS Fund Ltd: Lapse of Charitable Gift to Dissolved NUH Endowment Fund 27 Nov 2023 DFS (Claimant)Lost	27 Nov 2023	DFS (Claimant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; costs of $30,000 plus reasonable disbursements awarded to the Defendant, to be paid out from the Estate (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	UniCredit Bank AG v Glencore Singapore Pte Ltd: Letter of Credit Fraud & Misrepresentation 20 Oct 2022 UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff)Lost	20 Oct 2022	UniCredit Bank AG (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedAll claims against the defendant were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Standard Chartered Bank v Maersk Tankers: Misdelivery, Bills of Lading & Trade Finance 26 Sep 2022 Maersk Tankers Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Won	26 Sep 2022	Maersk Tankers Singapore Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal was allowed, and the orders made by the Assistant Registrar below were set aside.
5	United Petroleum Trading v Trafigura: Striking Out & Limitation of Actions in Futures Contract Dispute 22 Sep 2021 Trafigura Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	22 Sep 2021	Trafigura Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; United Petroleum Trading Limited is to pay costs of the appeal to the respondent fixed at $30,000 all in. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	CBB v Law Society: Mandatory Order for Legal Profession Act Complaint 28 Jan 2021 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Partial	28 Jan 2021	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal dismissed in part; mandatory order granted. Liable for costs of the appeal awarded to the appellant, fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	CBB v Law Society of Singapore: Costs Order in Judicial Review of Regulatory Function 18 Mar 2020 Law Society of Singapore (Respondent)Won	18 Mar 2020	Law Society of Singapore (Respondent): No costs order made against the RespondentThe court determined that the Respondent should not be required to pay the Applicant's costs.