Tan Yiting Gina

Tan Yiting Gina is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2015 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 1 law firm. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in torts and negligence. Their track record shows a 57.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 2 complex cases, representing 29% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	6 cases	16% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 16% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	3 cases	8% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	2 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Insurance	2 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Offer to Settle	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Quia timet injunction	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Protection of contractual rights	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Restraint of wrongs	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Patents	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Tan Yiting Gina has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Tan Yiting Gina has been affiliated with 1 law firm. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Legal Solutions LLC	7 cases	100% of cases	Lee Hui Chin v Chubb Insurance: Extension of Time for Arbitration(Mar 2024) Gazelle Ventures v. Lim Yong Sim: Quia Timet Injunction & Breach of Contract(Nov 2023) NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Offer to Settle & Cost Allocation(Sep 2018)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Tan Yiting Gina's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 2 (29%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	13.0 parties avg	3.0	14%
Partial	22.7 parties avg	2.7	29%
Won	43.7 parties avg	3.7	57%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Tan Yiting Gina's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(14%)	14%
Partial	2(29%)	29%
Won	4(57%)	57%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	427,353.70	71,225.626 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Lee Hui Chin v Chubb Insurance: Extension of Time for Arbitration 13 Mar 2024 Chubb Insurance Singapore Limited (Respondent)Partial	13 Mar 2024	Chubb Insurance Singapore Limited (Respondent): Costs AwardedCosts awarded to the respondent fixed at $10,000, including disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Gazelle Ventures v. Lim Yong Sim: Quia Timet Injunction & Breach of Contract 19 Nov 2023 GuGong Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	19 Nov 2023	GuGong Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application DismissedApplication dismissed with costs awarded to the defendants (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Offer to Settle & Cost Allocation 04 Sep 2018 Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent)Partial	04 Sep 2018	Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful; ordered to pay costs of the appeal fixed at $30,000 inclusive of disbursements, and 60% of the appellant's costs below, assessed on a standard basis, to be taxed on the District Court scale if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Negligence, Duty of Care & Economic Loss 18 Jul 2018 Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent)Lost	18 Jul 2018	Yap Tee Chuan (Respondent): Liable for negligenceYap Tee Chuan is liable for negligence in the amount of $176,176.85 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	NTUC Foodfare v SIA Engineering: Negligence & Pure Economic Loss Claim at Changi Airport 08 Oct 2017 Yap Tee Chuan (Defendant)Won	08 Oct 2017	Yap Tee Chuan (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the defendant as the court found that the defendant did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff.
6	Tienrui Design v G & Y Trading: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOP Act 15 Sep 2015 G & Y Trading and Manufacturing Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	15 Sep 2015	G & Y Trading and Manufacturing Pte Ltd (Defendant): Costs AwardedCosts fixed at $5,000 (inclusive of disbursements) awarded to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	Ship's Equipment Centre Bremen GmbH v Fuji Trading: Patent Infringement & Validity of Twistlock Coupling Device 22 Jun 2015 Fuji Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	22 Jun 2015	Fuji Trading (Singapore) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Plaintiff's applications to amend the patents dismissedThe court dismissed the plaintiff's applications to amend the patents.