Teo Weng Kie

Teo Weng Kie is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 22 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in personal injury and negligence. Their track record shows a 14.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 32% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated expertise across 69 primary practice areas, with significant experience in automobile accidents and personal injury.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Automobile Accidents	13 cases	8% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	13 cases	8% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 8% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	10 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Evidence	9 cases	6% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Negligence	7 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized81% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Damages	6 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Accident Law	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Torts	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contributory negligence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insurance Bad Faith	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Death	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Apportionment of Liability	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced62% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traffic Incident	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dependency Claim	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of future earnings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Company Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Crossclaims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disclosure of documents	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Actuarial Science	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Accident Reconstruction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Hazard Perception	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rectification Works	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Liability insurance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res ipsa loquitur	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Policy Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rule in Rylands v Fletcher	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Indemnity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loss of Dependency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Future Medical Expenses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractors’ All Risk Policy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third Party Claims	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Right of subrogation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Third Parties (Rights Against Insurers) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Policy Defences	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Vicarious liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Teo Weng Kie has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Teo Weng Kie has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 16 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Tan Kok Quan Partnership	16 cases	73% of cases	Ng Li Ning v Ting Jun Heng: Apportionment of Liability in Traffic Accident(Sep 2021) YCT Import & Export Pte Ltd v FG Food Industries Pte Ltd: Negligence Claim for Water Damage to Chinese Herbs(Aug 2021) Puspa Sinnappa v Balasingam: Assessment of Damages in Fatal Road Accident(Jul 2021)
Khattar Wong & Partners	3 cases	14% of cases	Hartford Insurance v Chiu Teng: Third Party Rights Against Insurers & Indemnity(Jan 2002) Chiu Teng Construction v Hartford Insurance: Third Parties Act & Insurer Liability(May 2001) Sim Chiang Lee v Lee Hock Chuan: Negligence, Duty of Care & Rylands v Fletcher(Dec 2000)
Securus Legal LLC	2 cases	9% of cases	Rajina Sharma v Theyvasigamani: Damages for Severe Brain Injury & Loss of Earnings(Feb 2024) Chia June Theo v Selvakumar Ranjan: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident(May 2023)
Legalworks Law Corporation	1 cases	5% of cases	Norhayati v Mohamed: Personal Injury Claim for Motorcycle Accident - Damages Assessment Appeal(Jan 2007)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Teo Weng Kie's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.3
Complex Cases: 7 (32%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	123.3 parties avg	3.3	55%
Neutral	34.5 parties avg	4.5	14%
Partial	43.1 parties avg	3.1	18%
Won	32.8 parties avg	2.8	14%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2015	52.9 parties avg	2.9
2020	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2021	43.6 parties avg	3.6
2023	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2024	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Teo Weng Kie's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(55%)	55%
Neutral	3(14%)	14%
Partial	4(18%)	18%
Won	3(14%)	14%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,366,239.84	363,853.3212 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2009	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	5 212	Lost: 2 cases (40.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (20.0%) Partial: 2 cases (40.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	4 31	Lost: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2023	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 22 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Rajina Sharma v Theyvasigamani: Damages for Severe Brain Injury & Loss of Earnings 12 Feb 2024 Theyvasigamani s/o Periasamy (Defendant)Lost	12 Feb 2024	Theyvasigamani s/o Periasamy (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; liable for 75% of the damages awarded to the plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Chia June Theo v Selvakumar Ranjan: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 02 May 2023 NTT Transport Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	02 May 2023	NTT Transport Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment granted in favor of the plaintiffs against the first and second defendants jointly for 100% liability, with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	Ng Li Ning v Ting Jun Heng: Apportionment of Liability in Traffic Accident 29 Sep 2021 Yap Kok Hua (Respondent)Won	29 Sep 2021	Yap Kok Hua (Respondent): Successful in resisting appealSuccessfully resisted the appeal. Awarded costs fixed at $22,000 inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	YCT Import & Export Pte Ltd v FG Food Industries Pte Ltd: Negligence Claim for Water Damage to Chinese Herbs 10 Aug 2021 FG Food Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 Aug 2021	FG Food Industries Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages to be paid to the Plaintiff in the amount of $652,728.34 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	Puspa Sinnappa v Balasingam: Assessment of Damages in Fatal Road Accident 01 Jul 2021 Yeoh Brothers Services Pte Ltd t/a Aero Supply Chartered Bus & Transport Trading (Defendant)Lost	01 Jul 2021	Yeoh Brothers Services Pte Ltd t/a Aero Supply Chartered Bus & Transport Trading (Defendant): Judgment against DefendantJudgment against the Defendant; damages awarded to the Plaintiff in the amount of $970,392.78 (subject to 85% liability on account of contributory negligence). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 24 Feb 2021 Yap Kok Hua (Defendant)Lost	24 Feb 2021	Yap Kok Hua (Defendant): Liability ApportionedThe first defendant was found 65% liable for the plaintiff's injuries. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
7	Ting Jun Heng v Yap Kok Hua: Negligence & Contributory Negligence in Road Accident 01 Oct 2020 Yap Kok Hua (Defendant)Lost	01 Oct 2020	Yap Kok Hua (Defendant): Liability ApportionedLiability apportioned at 65%. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
8	Huationg (Asia) v Lonpac Insurance: Work Injury Compensation & Motorcycling Exception 22 Dec 2015 HUATIONG (ASIA) PTE LTD (Appellant)Lost	22 Dec 2015	HUATIONG (ASIA) PTE LTD (Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed; Appellant to pay costs of the appeal to the Respondent, to be agreed or taxed.
9	AOD v AOE: Assessment of Damages for Quadriplegic Minor in Negligence Claim 19 Oct 2015 AOE (Defendant, Respondent)Lost	19 Oct 2015	AOE (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal dismissed in partDefendant's appeal against the costs ordered by the AR is dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Law Kin Ying v Lim Hong Hock: Dependency Claim, Personal Injury, PTSD & Depression 09 Jul 2015 Michael (Plaintiff)Partial	09 Jul 2015	Michael (Plaintiff): Judgment for Plaintiff in partJudgment for Plaintiff in part for PTSD & Depression. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Chai Yew Cian v Yeoh Yeow Yee: Negligence in Road Traffic Accident at Jurong Town Hall Road Junction 29 Apr 2015 Third defendant (Defendant)Partial	29 Apr 2015	Third defendant (Defendant): Liability ApportionedLiability fixed at 15%. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Koh Kow Tee Michael v Lee Ewe Ming Edward: Stay Application in Car Collision Claim 08 Mar 2015 Koh Kow Tee Michael (Plaintiff, Respondent)Neutral	08 Mar 2015	Koh Kow Tee Michael (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal by AIG dismissed; original action continues. No monetary award specified. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
13	AOD v AOE: Damages Assessment for Road Accident Brain Injury 20 Nov 2014 AOE (Defendant)Lost	20 Nov 2014	AOE (Defendant): Damages AssessedDamages assessed against the defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Lai Wai Keong Eugene v Loo Wei Yen: Assessment of Damages for Loss of Future Earnings and Medical Expenses in Personal Injury Case 28 May 2014 General Insurance Association of Singapore (Other)Neutral	28 May 2014	General Insurance Association of Singapore (Other): NeutralInvited to tender written submissions and attend a hearing.
15	Jagbir Singh v Lim Keh Thye: Deemed Discontinuance & Notice of Change of Solicitors 14 Jul 2009 The Society for the Physically Disabled L.K.A The Society for Aid to the Paralysed (Defendant, Respondent)Won	14 Jul 2009	The Society for the Physically Disabled L.K.A The Society for Aid to the Paralysed (Defendant, Respondent): WonAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Management Corp v DTZ: Specific Discovery & Litigation Privilege 29 Jun 2008 DTZ Debenham Tie Leung Property Management Services Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	29 Jun 2008	DTZ Debenham Tie Leung Property Management Services Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application for specific discovery allowed in partApplication for specific discovery allowed in part.
17	Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance: Arbitration Clauses, Insurance Policy Interpretation & Double Recovery 26 Jun 2008 Ace Insurance Ltd (Respondent)Lost	26 Jun 2008	Ace Insurance Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was allowed, and the respondent was ordered to pay the appellant's reasonable disbursements.
18	Tay Eng Chuan v Ace Insurance Ltd: Claim for Loss of Sight Insurance Benefit Dispute 04 Dec 2007 Ace Insurance Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Dec 2007	Ace Insurance Ltd (Defendant): Application grantedDefendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's originating summons was granted with costs of $3,500 and reasonable disbursements to be paid by the plaintiff. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Norhayati v Mohamed: Personal Injury Claim for Motorcycle Accident - Damages Assessment Appeal 10 Jan 2007 Mohamed Haedi Bin Abdullah (Respondent)Partial	10 Jan 2007	Mohamed Haedi Bin Abdullah (Respondent): Appeal partially unsuccessfulAppeal partially unsuccessful. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Hartford Insurance v Chiu Teng: Third Party Rights Against Insurers & Indemnity 23 Jan 2002 The Hartford Insurance Company (Singapore) Ltd (Appellant)Lost	23 Jan 2002	The Hartford Insurance Company (Singapore) Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedHartford's appeal was dismissed, and they were ordered to pay costs to Chiu Teng (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Chiu Teng Construction v Hartford Insurance: Third Parties Act & Insurer Liability 29 May 2001 The Hartford Insurance Company (Singapore) Ltd (formerly known as The People's Insurance Co Ltd) (Defendant)Lost	29 May 2001	The Hartford Insurance Company (Singapore) Ltd (formerly known as The People's Insurance Co Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment Against DefendantJudgment against the defendant in the amount of $446,600.08, plus interest at 6% per annum from 2000-05-30, and costs of $5,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
22	Sim Chiang Lee v Lee Hock Chuan: Negligence, Duty of Care & Rylands v Fletcher 04 Dec 2000 Others (Defendant)Neutral	04 Dec 2000	Others (Defendant): OtherThe trial continued against the third defendants.