Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam

Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in civil practice and civil procedure. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 8 complex cases, representing 100% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated expertise across 24 primary practice areas, with significant experience in arbitration and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Arbitration	6 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	6 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	5 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Costs	3 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	2 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitrator's Fees	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Architects and Engineers Liability	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Indemnity costs	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Standard form contract	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Leave to Appeal	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Standard form contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Singapore Institute of Architects standard form contracts	1 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 7 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Ling Das & Partners	7 cases	88% of cases	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Construction Dispute - EOT, CC, Defect Rectification(Oct 2022) Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Appeal Leave for Costs Order in Construction Dispute(Mar 2021) GTMS Construction v Ser Kim Koi: Costs Allocation in Construction Dispute(Feb 2021)
M/s Ling Das & Partners	1 cases	13% of cases	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Arbitration Award Set Aside Due to Arbitrator's Delay(Jan 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 8 (100%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	13%
Neutral	34.0 parties avg	4.0	38%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	25%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2022	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Thulasidas s/o Rengasamy Suppramaniam's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(13%)	13%
Neutral	3(38%)	38%
Partial	2(25%)	25%
Won	2(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	2,346,548.12	391,091.356 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 2	Neutral: 2 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2016	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Construction Dispute - EOT, CC, Defect Rectification 02 Oct 2022 GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Partial	02 Oct 2022	GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Judgment for Plaintiff upheld with modificationsJudgment for Plaintiff upheld with modifications. Liable for failing to paint all four sides of the steel beams.
2	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Appeal Leave for Costs Order in Construction Dispute 25 Mar 2021 GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Partial	25 Mar 2021	GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Partial WinGTMS was awarded $1,000 in costs from Ser Kim Koi for the leave application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	GTMS Construction v Ser Kim Koi: Costs Allocation in Construction Dispute 09 Feb 2021 GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim)Won	09 Feb 2021	GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in counterclaim): Costs awardedCosts awarded on a standard basis from 13 January 2014 up until 8 November 2018, with costs payable on an indemnity basis thereafter. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ser Kim Koi v GTMS Construction: Summary Judgment, SIA Conditions, Construction Contract, Fraud 03 Mar 2016 GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff)Lost	03 Mar 2016	GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; judgment and orders for costs entered into below by the AR and the Judge are set aside. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
5	GTMS Construction v Ser Kim Koi: Summary Judgment & Architect's Certificate 03 Nov 2014 GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	03 Nov 2014	GTMS Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $620,816.32 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Arbitration Award Set Aside Due to Arbitrator's Delay 17 Jan 2010 Teo Hee Lai Building Constructions Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	17 Jan 2010	Teo Hee Lai Building Constructions Pte Ltd (Defendant): Claim unresolvedDisputes and differences under the building contract remain unresolved.
7	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai: Extension of Time for Appeal Legal Issue 04 Jun 2008 Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	04 Jun 2008	Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): Application dismissedPrayer (i) of Summons 855/08 dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
8	Ting Kang Chung John v Teo Hee Lai Building Construction: Application for Extension of Time to Issue Arbitral Award 28 Apr 2008 Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant)Neutral	28 Apr 2008	Teo Hee Lai Building Construction Pte Ltd (Defendant): No order of committalThe court declined to make any order of committal against the defendant.