Vinodh S Coomaraswamy

Vinodh S Coomaraswamy is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2011. The lawyer has handled 23 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 4 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in estate administration and schemes of arrangement. Their track record shows a 48.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 13 complex cases, representing 57% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated expertise across 90 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and property law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	17 cases	9% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 9% of their total caseload.
Property Law	8 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 8 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	7 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	6 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Costs	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced72% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced64% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice13% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice47% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantees	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mistake	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced57% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Titles	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Garnishee Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Breach of Trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rescission	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Specific performance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Professional Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appeal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intestacy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estate Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Procedural Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reverse Takeover	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Inheritance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Law of Pleadings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Tracing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insurance Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Deeds of Release	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sale of Apartment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stakeholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security Memorandum	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance of breach of trust	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Traceable proceeds	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Cerebral Palsy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Credit and Security	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Easements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trusts and Estates	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assignment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Set-off	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Constructive trusts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Vinodh S Coomaraswamy has been affiliated with 4 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 10 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Shook Lin & Bok	10 cases	43% of cases	Ong Hien Yeow v Central Chambers LLC: Negligence in Property Purchase & Damages Assessment(Oct 2010) Management Corporation v Hyundai: Strata Titles, Common Property & Window Rectification(May 2007) Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Estate Inquiry Costs & Judgment(Jun 2003)
Shook Lin and Bok	8 cases	35% of cases	Tullett Prebon v Chua Leong Chuan: Interlocutory Injunction for Breach of Employment Contract(Aug 2005) Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca: Estate Distribution & Costs Dispute(May 2005) Multiplex Constructions v Sintal: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration for Delay Damages(Mar 2005)
Shook Lin & Bok LLP	4 cases	17% of cases	Chia Foong Lin v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Dispute over Kerb Wall, Gate, Parking & Use of Private Road(Dec 2011) Metroplex Berhad v Rothschild: Stay of Proceedings & Assignment Validity(Oct 2011) Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute(May 2009)
ShookLin & Bok LLP	1 cases	4% of cases	Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute(Feb 2010)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Vinodh S Coomaraswamy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.6
Complex Cases: 13 (57%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	15.0 parties avg	5.0	4%
Lost	44.2 parties avg	4.2	17%
Neutral	34.4 parties avg	4.4	13%
Partial	22.0 parties avg	2.0	9%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	4%
Unknown	15.0 parties avg	5.0	4%
Won	115.4 parties avg	5.4	48%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2001	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	310.3 parties avg	10.3
2003	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2004	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2005	44.6 parties avg	4.6
2007	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2011	23.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Vinodh S Coomaraswamy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(4%)	4%
Lost	4(17%)	17%
Neutral	3(13%)	13%
Partial	2(9%)	9%
Stayed	1(4%)	4%
Unknown	1(4%)	4%
Won	11(48%)	48%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	8,285,200.00	637,323.0813 cases	13

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2002	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2003	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Unknown: 1 cases (50.0%)
2004	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2005	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Neutral: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2007	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Stayed: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 23 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Chia Foong Lin v Chan Yuen Yee: Easement Dispute over Kerb Wall, Gate, Parking & Use of Private Road 11 Dec 2011 Chan Yuen Yee Alexia Eve (Defendant)Won	11 Dec 2011	Chan Yuen Yee Alexia Eve (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs awarded against the Plaintiffs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Metroplex Berhad v Rothschild: Stay of Proceedings & Assignment Validity 09 Oct 2011 Morgan Stanley Emerging Market Inc (Defendant, Respondent)Stayed	09 Oct 2011	Morgan Stanley Emerging Market Inc (Defendant, Respondent): Stay of proceedings grantedStay granted on similar terms as the stay order for Suit 915 against Rothschild regarding the appeal to set aside the order granting leave to Metroplex to serve a sealed copy of the Writ of Summons in Suit 915 on MSEM in New York.
3	Ong Hien Yeow v Central Chambers LLC: Negligence in Property Purchase & Damages Assessment 14 Oct 2010 Ong Hien Yeow (Plaintiff)Won	14 Oct 2010	Ong Hien Yeow (Plaintiff): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; matter remitted for reassessment of damages.
4	Cheong Lay Yong v Muthukumaran: Specific Performance & Option Contract Dispute 28 Feb 2010 K Krishna & Partners (Third Party)Dismissed	28 Feb 2010	K Krishna & Partners (Third Party): Claim DismissedThe Defendants’ claims against the 1st Third Party were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Pender Development v Chesney Real Estate: Loan, Insurance Bond & Misrepresentation Dispute 25 May 2009 Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant)Lost	25 May 2009	Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for Chesney Real Estate Group LLP against Bravo Building Construction Pte Ltd for $8,284,000.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Tsai Jean v Har Mee Lee: Collective Sale Dispute over Cairnhill Heights 17 Nov 2008 Tsai Jean (Appellant)Lost	17 Nov 2008	Tsai Jean (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be taxed unless agreed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
7	Management Corporation v Hyundai: Strata Titles, Common Property & Window Rectification 10 May 2007 Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Defendant)Lost	10 May 2007	Hyundai Engineering & Construction Co Ltd (Defendant): Declaration AgainstDeclaration made against the defendant that the management corporation had a duty to maintain the windows until 1 April 2005 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	Tullett Prebon v Chua Leong Chuan: Interlocutory Injunction for Breach of Employment Contract 18 Aug 2005 Tullett Liberty Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	18 Aug 2005	Tullett Liberty Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Applications for interlocutory injunctions allowedThe plaintiffs' applications for interlocutory injunctions against the defendants were allowed, preventing them from working for the intervener during their notice period.
9	Lim Lie Hoa v Ong Jane Rebecca: Estate Distribution & Costs Dispute 03 May 2005 Ong Keng Tong (Appellant)Lost	03 May 2005	Ong Keng Tong (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs to be paid to Jane Ong. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Multiplex Constructions v Sintal: Stay of Proceedings & Arbitration for Delay Damages 02 Mar 2005 Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Appellant)Partial	02 Mar 2005	Multiplex Constructions Pty Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, stay granted for interim certificates 28, 29, and 30. No stay for interim certificate 27. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Estate Assets & Breach of Trust 18 Jan 2005 Ong Siauw Ping (Respondent)Neutral	18 Jan 2005	Ong Siauw Ping (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, maintaining the status quo regarding the respondent's interests in the estate.
12	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd v Wisanggeni Lauw: Dispute over Judgment Terms & Amendment to Statement of Claim 19 Sep 2004 Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Partial	19 Sep 2004	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Amendment to Statement of Claim to be incorporatedPlaintiff directed to incorporate the amendment into the Statement of Claim, which should then be reflected in the judgment.
13	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Application to Expunge Documents from Record of Appeal 26 Aug 2004 Ong Keng Tong (Respondent, Defendant)Won	26 Aug 2004	Ong Keng Tong (Respondent, Defendant): Application grantedFourth respondent's application to exclude certain documents from the record of appeal was granted; costs of $600 awarded jointly to the third and fourth respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd v Wisanggeni Lauw: Contract Formation & Share Transfer Dispute 29 Jun 2004 Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Jun 2004	Full Fledge Holdings Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim AllowedPlaintiff's claim allowed; the defendant is ordered to transfer 10,625,000 UFS shares to Bank of China for the account of Kang. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Appeal over Estate Valuation and Distribution 15 Jun 2004 Ong Keng Tong (Defendant)Won	15 Jun 2004	Ong Keng Tong (Defendant): Appeal dismissedFourth defendant's appeal against the AR’s findings as to the amount distributed to the second defendant was dismissed.
16	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Estate Inquiry Costs & Judgment 29 Jun 2003 Ong Keng Tong (Fourth Defendant)Neutral	29 Jun 2003	Ong Keng Tong (Fourth Defendant): Costs of inquiry to be paid by First DefendantThe First Defendant shall pay the Third and Fourth Defendants’ costs of the inquiry. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Inquiry into Deceased's Estate Distribution 12 Jun 2003 Ong Keng Tong (Defendant)	12 Jun 2003	Ong Keng Tong (Defendant): -
18	ICB Ltd v P. D. International: Rectification of Security Memorandum for MEP Facilities 14 Nov 2002 P. D. International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	14 Nov 2002	P. D. International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Rectification GrantedPDI's application to rectify the Security Memorandum by deleting the phrase "and/or the Mortgagor" in cll 1.1, 8.1 and wherever else that phrase appears was granted. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
19	Ong Jane Rebecca v Lim Lie Hoa: Interim Payments, Mareva Injunctions & Third Party Proceedings in Estate Inquiry 26 Sep 2002 Third and Fourth Defendants (Defendant)Neutral	26 Sep 2002	Third and Fourth Defendants (Defendant): Application to stop interim payment redundantApplication to stop any payment that might be made to the plaintiff and second defendant was redundant.
20	Malaysian International Trading Corp v Interamerica Asia: Breach of Trust, Conspiracy to Defraud, Dishonest Assistance 29 Aug 2002 Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff)Won	29 Aug 2002	Malaysian International Trading Corp Sdn Bhd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff except in relation to the fourth, ninth, tenth, thirteenth and fourteenth defendants. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
21	Daewoo Singapore v CEL Tractors: Scheme of Arrangement & Third-Party Guarantees 19 Aug 2001 CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	19 Aug 2001	CEL Tractors Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. Security deposit released to the respondents. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Daewoo Singapore v CEL Tractors: Scheme of Arrangement & Guarantor Release 19 Aug 2001 CEL Tractors Private Limited (Respondent)Won	19 Aug 2001	CEL Tractors Private Limited (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The security deposit together with the interest, if any, will be released to the respondents or their solicitors to account of costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Keppel Tatlee Bank v Teck Koon Investment: Estoppel, Mortgages & Land Titles Act 28 Feb 2000 Keppel Tatlee Bank Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	28 Feb 2000	Keppel Tatlee Bank Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim allowedThe plaintiff's claim for vacant possession of the mortgaged property was allowed.