Wong Soon Peng Adrian

Wong Soon Peng Adrian is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2008 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 20 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 3 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and defamation. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 10 complex cases, representing 50% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated expertise across 78 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and civil procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	14 cases	10% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 14 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced56% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	5 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice31% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced59% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	4 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice49% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	4 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized79% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Defamation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced66% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice8% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages Assessment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Service out of jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Setting aside	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Avoidance of transactions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Striking off defunct companies	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Interest	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Transactions at an undervalue	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Joint Tenancy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty to Account	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Enforcement of Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conflict of Laws	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Residential Property Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipbuilding Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Welding Defects	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Warranty Obligations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Side Letter	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Loan Agreements	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Penalty Doctrine	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equity of Redemption	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Pyramid Scheme	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Fraud	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Equitable Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shipping	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Ponzi Schemes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unfair Dismissal	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Soon Peng Adrian has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Soon Peng Adrian has been affiliated with 3 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 13 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	13 cases	65% of cases	Seatrium New Energy v HJ Shipbuilding: Contractual Terms, Warranties & Estoppel(Sep 2024) Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt(Feb 2024) Seatrium v HJ Shipbuilding: Breach of Shipbuilding Sub-Contract over Welding Defects(Sep 2023)
Rajah & Tann LLP	6 cases	30% of cases	Lee Chen Seong Jeremy v Official Assignee: Striking Off Defunct Company with Outstanding Assets(Aug 2018) Loh Siew Hock v Lang Chin Ngau: Defamation Claim in Char Yong Association Election(Sep 2014) Lee Wee Lick Terence v Chua Say Eng: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act Dispute(Nov 2012)
Rajah & Tann	1 cases	5% of cases	Hytech Builders v Goh: Defamation, Fair Comment & Qualified Privilege(Apr 2008)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Soon Peng Adrian's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.1
Complex Cases: 10 (50%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	124.0 parties avg	4.0	60%
Partial	34.5 parties avg	4.5	15%
Won	58.4 parties avg	8.4	25%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2008	24.4 parties avg	4.4
2010	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2018	212.5 parties avg	12.5
2019	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2020	35.5 parties avg	5.5
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2023	33.0 parties avg	3.0
2024	22.5 parties avg	2.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Soon Peng Adrian's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	12(60%)	60%
Partial	3(15%)	15%
Won	5(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	18,000.00	1,500.0012 cases	12

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2008	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	3 3	Lost: 3 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2023	3 12	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 2 cases (66.7%)
2024	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 20 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Seatrium New Energy v HJ Shipbuilding: Contractual Terms, Warranties & Estoppel 15 Sep 2024 Seatrium New Energy Ltd (formerly known as Keppel FELS Ltd) (Appellant)Lost	15 Sep 2024	Seatrium New Energy Ltd (formerly known as Keppel FELS Ltd) (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs awarded to the respondent in the sum of S$60,000 including disbursements. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	Affert Resources Pte Ltd v Industries Chimiques: Insolvency Law, Undervalue Transactions & Waiver of Debt 27 Feb 2024 Affert Resources Pte Ltd (in court compulsory winding up) (Applicant)Lost	27 Feb 2024	Affert Resources Pte Ltd (in court compulsory winding up) (Applicant): Application dismissedThe applicant's application to unwind the effects of a transaction that was allegedly at an undervalue was dismissed.
3	Seatrium v HJ Shipbuilding: Breach of Shipbuilding Sub-Contract over Welding Defects 19 Sep 2023 Seatrium New Energy Ltd (formerly known as Keppel FELS Ltd) (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Sep 2023	Seatrium New Energy Ltd (formerly known as Keppel FELS Ltd) (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for breach of contract and negligence was dismissed.
4	CSO v CSP: Without Prejudice Privilege & Admissibility of Evidence in Settlement Negotiations 07 Feb 2023 CSO (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	07 Feb 2023	CSO (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Dismissed in partAppeal dismissed, with limitations on the portions of disputed emails that the first defendant could refer to.
5	Ethoz Capital Ltd v Im8ex Pte Ltd: Penalty Doctrine, Misrepresentation, and Mortgage Redemption 19 Jan 2023 Ethoz Capital Ltd (Appellant)Partial	19 Jan 2023	Ethoz Capital Ltd (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part, but the main part of the Judge’s findings that the payment of the Total Interest upon default and the Default Interest, were unenforceable penalties was upheld. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	Law Society of Singapore v Ooi Oon Tat: Disciplinary Proceedings for Negligence 02 Aug 2022 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	02 Aug 2022	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application AllowedThe Law Society's application to sanction the respondent was allowed. Costs fixed in the aggregate sum of $18,000 in favour of the applicant being the costs for OS 1 and also for C3J/SUM 1/2022 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Cosmetic Care Asia Ltd v Sri Linarti Sasmito: Service Out of Jurisdiction Dispute 28 Jun 2021 Sri Linarti Sasmito (Defendant)Won	28 Jun 2021	Sri Linarti Sasmito (Defendant): Summons dismissedDefendant's application to discharge/set aside the order of an assistant registrar granting the plaintiffs leave to serve the originating process on the defendant out of jurisdiction was dismissed.
8	Viking Engineering v. Feen: Minority Oppression & Share Valuation Dispute 26 Apr 2020 Feen Marine Scrubbers Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff)Lost	26 Apr 2020	Feen Marine Scrubbers Pte Ltd (Defendant, Plaintiff): Originating Summons dismissedOriginating Summons filed by the defendants was dismissed. The purchase price of the shares was set in accordance with the valuation determined in the Report. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	LVM Law Chambers LLC v Wan Hoe Keet: Conflict of Interest & Legal Representation 02 Apr 2020 Ho Sally (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff)Lost	02 Apr 2020	Ho Sally (Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; required to pay costs of $25,000 plus reasonable disbursements to the appellant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
10	Chain Land Elevator Corp v FB Industries: Writ of Seizure and Sale on Joint Tenancy 06 Jan 2020 Lee Buck Huang (Defendant, Applicant)Lost	06 Jan 2020	Lee Buck Huang (Defendant, Applicant): Summons dismissedSummons to set aside the writ of seizure and sale was dismissed.
11	Wan Hoe Keet v LVM Law Chambers LLC: Conflict of Interest and Injunction in Legal Representation 22 Apr 2019 Ho Sally (Applicant, Defendant)Won	22 Apr 2019	Ho Sally (Applicant, Defendant): Application allowedThe application to enjoin LVM Law Chambers LLC from acting for Chan Pik Sun in Suit 806 was allowed.
12	Lim Hun Joo v Kok Yin Chong: Collective Sale of Goodluck Garden - Land Titles (Strata) Act 25 Nov 2018 Chan Keng Siang Gregory (Plaintiff)Won	25 Nov 2018	Chan Keng Siang Gregory (Plaintiff): Application GrantedOrder granted for the collective sale of the property.
13	Lee Chen Seong Jeremy v Official Assignee: Striking Off Defunct Company with Outstanding Assets 16 Aug 2018 Lee Chen Seong Jeremy (Appellant)Won	16 Aug 2018	Lee Chen Seong Jeremy (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court found that Northstar had abandoned its right of proof against the Appellant’s bankruptcy estate.
14	Lee Siew Ngug v Lee Brothers: Rectification of Company Register & Minority Shareholder Rights 22 Apr 2015 Lee Siew Ngug (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	22 Apr 2015	Lee Siew Ngug (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Plaintiffs' originating summons was struck out. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
15	Loh Siew Hock v Lang Chin Ngau: Defamation Claim in Char Yong Association Election 28 Sep 2014 Loh Siew Hock (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Sep 2014	Loh Siew Hock (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed; no damages awarded. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
16	Lee Wee Lick Terence v Chua Say Eng: Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act Dispute 01 Nov 2012 Lee Wee Lick Terence (alias Li Weili Terence) (Appellant, Respondent)Lost	01 Nov 2012	Lee Wee Lick Terence (alias Li Weili Terence) (Appellant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedLee Wee Lick Terence's appeal was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
17	Tay Jui Chuan v Koh Joo Ann: Beneficial Ownership Dispute under Residential Property Act 18 Aug 2010 Inhil Investment Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	18 Aug 2010	Inhil Investment Pte Ltd (Appellant): Counterclaim DismissedCounterclaim dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
18	Basil Anthony Herman v Premier Security: Defamation, Wrongful Dismissal & Subpoena Dispute 06 Apr 2010 Annie Leow Cher Kheng (Respondent)Lost	06 Apr 2010	Annie Leow Cher Kheng (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal set aside the decision of the Judge and ordered a new trial on Basil's defences and his counterclaim.
19	Hytech Builders v Goh: Defamation, Fair Comment & Qualified Privilege 07 Apr 2008 Hytech Builders Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	07 Apr 2008	Hytech Builders Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe defamation claim was dismissed due to the defense of qualified privilege being successfully invoked by the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Murakami Takako v Wiryadi Louise Maria: Jurisdiction over Foreign Immovables & Estoppel in Matrimonial Disputes 31 Mar 2008 Ryuzo Murakami (Defendant)Partial	31 Mar 2008	Ryuzo Murakami (Defendant): Application partially deniedPlaintiff's application to include foreign immovables in Australia and Indonesia was denied.