Wong Woon Kwong

Wong Woon Kwong is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2012 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 45 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 2 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in criminal law and criminal procedure. Their track record shows a 73.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 11% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated expertise across 67 primary practice areas, with significant experience in criminal law and criminal procedure.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Criminal Law	37 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 37 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	36 cases	13% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 36 cases which represents 13% of their total caseload.
Misuse of Drugs Act	32 cases	11% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 32 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Sentencing	28 cases	10% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 28 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	12 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	11 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 11 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Evidence	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Constitutional Law	8 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced52% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 8 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Appeal	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Criminal Revision	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Penal Code	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	5 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice44% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Contract Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice14% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Review	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized84% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Crimes	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Import and Export Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Candour	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Drug Trafficking	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal conspiracy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Criminal Review	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Capital Punishment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Importation of Drugs	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Courier	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Protection from Harassment Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Attempted culpable homicide	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Importation of controlled drugs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mens rea	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Application for Adjournment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Drunk driving	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Loan Sharking	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Automobile Accidents	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Harassment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Malpractice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Theft	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contempt of Court	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Stay of Execution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Road Traffic Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Moneylenders Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offences	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Witnesses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judicial Review	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Affidavits	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Money Laundering	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adduction of new evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal liability of solicitor for costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remote Gambling Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Alteration of Charge	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Confiscation and forfeiture	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Hearsay	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Wong Woon Kwong has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Wong Woon Kwong has been affiliated with 2 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 44 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Attorney-General’s Chambers	44 cases	98% of cases	Iskandar bin Rahmat v Public Prosecutor: Review Application and Stay of Execution(Feb 2025) Masoud Rahimi v Public Prosecutor: Application for Stay of Execution in Capital Case(Nov 2024) Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application(Jul 2024)
Public Prosecutor	1 cases	2% of cases	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Application for Stay of Execution(Aug 2024)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Wong Woon Kwong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.4
Complex Cases: 5 (11%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	4%
Neutral	22.5 parties avg	2.5	4%
Partial	73.0 parties avg	3.0	16%
Remanded	13.0 parties avg	3.0	2%
Won	332.3 parties avg	2.3	73%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2013	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2016	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	52.6 parties avg	2.6
2018	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2019	32.7 parties avg	2.7
2020	72.7 parties avg	2.7
2021	42.5 parties avg	2.5
2022	32.8 parties avg	2.8
2023	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2024	52.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Wong Woon Kwong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(4%)	4%
Neutral	2(4%)	4%
Partial	7(16%)	16%
Remanded	1(2%)	2%
Won	33(73%)	73%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	55,000.00	13,750.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2013	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2014	2 11	Remanded: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	4 13	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2017	5 14	Partial: 1 cases (20.0%) Won: 4 cases (80.0%)
2018	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	3 12	Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2020	7 34	Partial: 3 cases (42.9%) Won: 4 cases (57.1%)
2021	4 13	Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 3 cases (75.0%)
2022	3 3	Won: 3 cases (100.0%)
2023	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	5 5	Won: 5 cases (100.0%)
2025	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 45 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application for Drug Trafficking 13 Feb 2025 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	13 Feb 2025	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's application for permission to make a review application.
2	Iskandar bin Rahmat v Public Prosecutor: Review Application and Stay of Execution 03 Feb 2025 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Feb 2025	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe application for permission to make a review application and for a stay of execution was dismissed.
3	Masoud Rahimi v Public Prosecutor: Application for Stay of Execution in Capital Case 27 Nov 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe court dismissed the applicant's application.
4	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Application for Stay of Execution 01 Aug 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	01 Aug 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedApplication for stay of execution was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Moad Fadzir bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application 29 Jul 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Jul 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Costs awardedCosts of $5,000 awarded against the applicant's counsel, Ong Ying Ping (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Moad Fadzir v PP: Review Application for Drug Trafficking Conviction and Mandatory Death Sentence 20 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	20 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for permission to review.
7	Moad Fadzir v PP: Application for Judge Recusal Based on Apprehension of Bias 16 May 2024 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	16 May 2024	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe application for Justice Tay Yong Kwang to recuse himself from hearing CM 15 was dismissed.
8	Tika Pesik v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review for Drug Trafficking Conviction 29 Nov 2023 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Nov 2023	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe Court dismissed the applicant's motion.
9	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Personal Costs Orders Against Defence Counsel 25 May 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant)Won	25 May 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent, Defendant): Costs AwardedCosts awarded against the appellant's counsels. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
10	Panchalai v Public Prosecutor: Stay of Execution Application Based on Reasonable Apprehension of Bias 25 Apr 2022 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	25 Apr 2022	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedCriminal motion dismissed.
11	Nagaenthran v Attorney-General: Abuse of Process & Mental Capacity in Death Penalty Case 28 Mar 2022 Attorney-General (Respondent)Won	28 Mar 2022	Attorney-General (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe appeal was dismissed, in favor of the Attorney-General.
12	Imran v PP; Tamilselvam v PP: Retrial Ordered for MDA Offences After Co-Accused Acquittal 22 Sep 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	22 Sep 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): PartialThe court ordered a joint retrial of both altered charges before a different judge of the General Division of the High Court.
13	Mah Kiat Seng v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Reference on Private Defence & Evidence Act 10 Aug 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	10 Aug 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Motion DismissedThe respondent successfully opposed the applicant's motion.
14	Abdul Karim v Public Prosecutor: Dual Charging Practice under Misuse of Drugs Act 29 Mar 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	29 Mar 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
15	Sinnappan v Public Prosecutor: Criminal Review Application for Methamphetamine Importation 18 Feb 2021 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	18 Feb 2021	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe applicant's application for leave to make a review application was dismissed.
16	Imran v PP: Drug Trafficking, Common Intention, Wilful Blindness, Misuse of Drugs Act 17 Dec 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	17 Dec 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal on the charge against Pragas was allowed and he was acquitted of this charge.
17	Koo Kah Yee v Public Prosecutor: Remote Gambling Act & Sentencing Appeal 26 Nov 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	26 Nov 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the sentence.
18	Moad Fadzir Bin Mustaffa v Public Prosecutor: Review of Drug Trafficking Conviction and Sentencing 11 Oct 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	11 Oct 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully opposed the application for leave to review the earlier decision.
19	Effrizan Kamisran v Public Prosecutor: Drug Rehabilitation, Prosecutorial Discretion, and Abuse of Process 05 Jul 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	05 Jul 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal dismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal.
20	Saravanan Chandaram v Public Prosecutor: Importation of Cannabis and Cannabis Mixture under the Misuse of Drugs Act 28 Apr 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant)Partial	28 Apr 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent, Applicant): Partial LossConviction for Importation of Cannabis Mixture Charge set aside.
21	Lee Shing Chan v Public Prosecutor: Unlawful Stalking and Abusive Language Towards Public Servant 27 Feb 2020 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Feb 2020	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial WinThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the conviction of the Appellants, but the sentence was reduced on appeal.
22	Gobi a/l Avedian v Attorney-General: Judicial Review & Equal Protection of Law 12 Feb 2020 Attorney-General (Defendant)Won	12 Feb 2020	Attorney-General (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantApplications dismissed in favour of the Attorney-General.
23	Public Prosecutor v Govindarajan: Attempted Culpable Homicide Sentencing 24 Nov 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	24 Nov 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Sentence imposedAccused sentenced to three years’ and three months’ imprisonment.
24	Public Prosecutor v Mohamed Shalleh: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 09 Apr 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	09 Apr 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused convicted of drug trafficking.
25	PP v Andi Ashwar & Ors: Drug Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Feb 2019 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Partial	26 Feb 2019	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): PartialConviction of Andi Ashwar and Mohd Akebal as charged. Conviction of Mohammed Rusli Bin Abdul Rahman on amended charge.
26	Hamzah bin Ibrahim v Public Prosecutor: Adjournment Application in Drug Trafficking Appeal 01 Aug 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Neutral	01 Aug 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AdjournedAppeal adjourned to an early date to be fixed, such date not to be before 16 August 2018.
27	Sinnappan a/l Nadarajah v Public Prosecutor: Illegal Importation of Methamphetamine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 02 May 2018 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	02 May 2018	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Conviction AffirmedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal, and the appellant's conviction was affirmed.
28	Muhammad Nur bin Abdullah v Public Prosecutor: Breach of Probation and Reformative Training Eligibility 27 Nov 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 Nov 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's appeal was upheld, and the applicant was deemed ineligible for reformative training.
29	PP v Muhammad Farid: Trafficking, Misuse of Drugs Act & Penal Code 20 Sep 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	20 Sep 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for the ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against all three accused persons.
30	Kester v. Public Prosecutor: Drunk Driving Sentencing & Injury 27 Jul 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	27 Jul 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Partial LossThe appeal was partially successful, resulting in a reduced imprisonment sentence for the appellant.
31	Suventher Shanmugam v. Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Cannabis Importation Under the Misuse of Drugs Act 03 Apr 2017 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2017	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Court of Appeal upheld the original sentence.
32	Public Prosecutor v Alagesan Nathan: Drug Trafficking - Mandatory Minimum Sentence 02 Apr 2017 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	02 Apr 2017	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe accused persons were sentenced to the mandatory minimum sentence.
33	PP v Pham Duyen Quyen: Importation of Methamphetamine & Misuse of Drugs Act 16 Oct 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	16 Oct 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): WonThe accused was found guilty as charged.
34	PP v Suventher Shanmugam: Illegally Importing Cannabis into Singapore 30 Aug 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	30 Aug 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused sentenced to 23 years imprisonment and 15 strokes of the cane.
35	K Saravanan Kuppusamy v Public Prosecutor: Sentencing for Abetting Drug Offences under the Misuse of Drugs Act 18 Aug 2016 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	18 Aug 2016	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal LostThe appeal was allowed and the term of imprisonment was reduced from 7 years to 4.5 years.
36	PP v Hishamrudin: Trafficking Diamorphine & Misuse of Drugs Act 05 Apr 2016 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	05 Apr 2016	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionAccused found guilty on both charges.
37	PP v Chum Tat Suan: Statutory Relief for Drug Couriers under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Nov 2014 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Remanded	27 Nov 2014	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Cases remitted to the JudgeThe cases concerning Abdul Kahar and Chum were remitted to the Judge, who shall determine whether Abdul Kahar’s and Chum’s involvement in the offences under ss 5(1) and 7 of the MDA respectively was restricted to the activities under ss 33B(2)(a) and 33B(3)(a).
38	Muhammad Ridzuan v PP: Trafficking, Common Intention, Misuse of Drugs Act. Appeal Dismissed. 27 May 2014 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	27 May 2014	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedSuccessfully defended the High Court's decision to convict the appellant on drug charges.
39	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Sentencing under the Misuse of Drugs Act 23 Oct 2013 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Neutral	23 Oct 2013	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Accused found to be a courierThe court found that the accused acted as a courier only, giving him the benefit of the doubt under the new sentencing provisions.
40	Public Prosecutor v Abdul Kahar bin Othman: Trafficking of Diamorphine under the Misuse of Drugs Act 26 Aug 2013 Public Prosecutor (Prosecution)Won	26 Aug 2013	Public Prosecutor (Prosecution): Judgment for ProsecutionThe Public Prosecutor won the case against the accused.
41	PP v Adnan bin Kadir: Importation of Controlled Drugs & Purpose of Trafficking under Misuse of Drugs Act 27 Jun 2013 Public Prosecutor (Applicant)Won	27 Jun 2013	Public Prosecutor (Applicant): Appeal AllowedThe Court of Appeal held that the prosecution does not need to prove that the accused imported the controlled drug for the purpose of trafficking to secure a conviction under Section 7 of the Misuse of Drugs Act.
42	Adnan bin Kadir v PP: Importation of Diamorphine, Personal Consumption Defence 27 Sep 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Lost	27 Sep 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal AllowedThe appeal was allowed, and the case was remitted to the District Court for a new trial.
43	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Misuse of Drugs Act & Presumption of Knowledge in Drug Importation 28 Aug 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	28 Aug 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Application DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended against the application to set aside the conviction and sentence.
44	Ong Chee Eng v Public Prosecutor: Loan Shark Harassment & Sentencing Principles 23 May 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Partial	23 May 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal Partially UpheldThe Public Prosecutor's original sentence was partially upheld, with the fine and caning remaining, but the imprisonment term was reduced (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
45	Dinesh Pillai v PP: Importation of Diamorphine and Rebuttal of Statutory Presumption 03 Apr 2012 Public Prosecutor (Respondent)Won	03 Apr 2012	Public Prosecutor (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe Public Prosecutor successfully defended the appeal against the conviction for importing diamorphine.