Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd

Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 3 law firms. They have been involved in 1 complex case, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Kenneth Tan Partnership	1 case	Kenneth Tan SC
Manjit Govind and Partners	1 case	Manjit Singh Sree Govind Menon
Wong Partnership	1 case	Wong Meng Meng Tan Hsiang Yue

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 1 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	23.0 parties avg	3.0	66.7%
Partial	16.0 parties avg	6.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2004	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2003	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Afro-Asia Shipping Co (Pte) Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Partial	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2004	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2004-sghc-105 20 May 2004	20 May 2004	Plaintiff	PartialThe plaintiffs were successful in a minor portion of their claim against CKK, but were ordered to pay 85% of CKK's costs of defending the claim with respect to liability. The plaintiffs were unsuccessful in their claim against Trevi and were ordered to pay Trevi's costs of defending the claim. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2003-sghc-21 09 Feb 2003	09 Feb 2003	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed with costs to both defendants. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2002-sghc-182 13 Aug 2002	13 Aug 2002	Defendant	LostApplications for review of the taxation order were dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.