Alphomega Research Group Ltd

Alphomega Research Group Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Alphomega Research Group Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	2 cases	Wendell Wong Adrian Tan Robert Raj Joseph Brenda Lim
M & A Law Corporation	1 case	Prakash Mulani
Sterling Law Corporation	1 case	Roy Yeo
Nanyang Law LLC	1 case	Ismail Atan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Alphomega Research Group Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25.0%
Withdrawn	13.0 parties avg	3.0	25.0%
Won	23.5 parties avg	3.5	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2011	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Alphomega Research Group Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Withdrawn	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Withdrawn: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sghc-184 09 Sep 2012	09 Sep 2012	Plaintiff	WithdrawnAlphomega was granted leave to withdraw its counterclaim (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2011-sghc-117 10 May 2011	10 May 2011	Defendant, Plaintiff	WonSecurity for costs not ordered. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2010-sghc-133 29 Apr 2010	29 Apr 2010	Defendant, Appellant	WonAppeal against the decision of the learned assistant registrar was allowed. The court ordered that the costs order below was to remain and made no order as to costs in the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2009-sghc-106 29 Apr 2009	29 Apr 2009	Defendant	LostThe court ordered Mr. Goh and Ms. Tan to purchase the shares of Dr. Tan at an agreed price or at a price determined by a jointly appointed valuer, whose decision, which is not to take into account any discount for minority shareholdings, shall be final. If there is no agreement between the parties on the price or on the mechanism and other relevant details for determining the price of the shares within 30 days, the company will be wound up.