Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar

Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar has been represented by 2 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Intelligen Legal LLC	1 case	Tan Cheng Han
Frontier Law Corporation	1 case	Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar Sadique Marican Anand Kumar

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	14.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	66.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2008	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Anand Kumar s/o Toofani Beldar's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(33.3%)	33.3%
Won	2(66.7%)	66.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	380,600.00	190,300.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sghc-19 19 Jan 2011	19 Jan 2011	Respondent	WonAnand was found not liable for the charges against him.
2	2009-sghc-161 09 Jul 2009	09 Jul 2009	Defendant, Appellant	LostAppeal dismissed; summary judgment against the first and second defendants for $380,600 with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2008-sghc-189 28 Oct 2008	28 Oct 2008	Defendant, Appellant	WonAppeal allowed; the court held that the Assistant Registrar's decision to extend time for service was correct (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).