Ban Song Long David

Ban Song Long David is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Ban Song Long David has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew and Napier LLC	3 cases	Davinder Singh Adrian Tan Cheryl Tan Hri Kumar Chelsia Wong
Drew and Napier	1 case	Davinder Singh Adrian Tan Chelsia Wong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Ban Song Long David's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.5
Complex Cases: 2 (50.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	43.5 parties avg	3.5	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2005	23.5 parties avg	3.5
2004	23.5 parties avg	3.5

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Ban Song Long David's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	4(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2005	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2004	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2005-sgca-35 18 Jul 2005	18 Jul 2005	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2005-sgca-18 03 Apr 2005	03 Apr 2005	Respondent	WonThe respondent successfully defended the appeal, and was awarded the costs of the appeal. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2004-sghc-253 09 Nov 2004	09 Nov 2004	Defendant	WonThe defamation claim against the defendant was dismissed.
4	2004-sghc-225 30 Sep 2004	30 Sep 2004	Defendant	WonThe plaintiff's defamation claim was dismissed with costs to be agreed or taxed by the registrar. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.