Bjornar Feen also known as Bjoernar Feen

Bjornar Feen also known as Bjoernar Feen is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 4 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Bjornar Feen also known as Bjoernar Feen has been represented by 4 law firms and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Wong Soon Peng Adrian Ang Leong Hao Sara Sim
Xavier & Associates LLC	1 case	Byron Nicholas Xavier
Vicki Heng Law Corporation	1 case	Kelvin Tan Sara Ng
RBN Chambers LLC	1 case	Ramesh Bharani s/o K Nagaratnam Ong Ying Ting Eunice

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Bjornar Feen also known as Bjoernar Feen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	36.0 parties avg	6.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Bjornar Feen also known as Bjoernar Feen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghc-144 28 Jun 2022	28 Jun 2022	Defendant, Plaintiff	LostInjunction granted to restrain Mr. Feen and his agents from using the name 'Viking'.
2	2020-sgca-112 16 Nov 2020	16 Nov 2020	Applicant, Appellant, Plaintiff, Defendant	LostAppeal against the High Court's decision was dismissed.
3	2020-sghc-78 26 Apr 2020	26 Apr 2020	Defendant, Plaintiff	LostOriginating Summons filed by the defendants was dismissed. The purchase price of the shares was set in accordance with the valuation determined in the Report. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.