BT Engineering Pte Ltd

BT Engineering Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 33.3% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

BT Engineering Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Low Yi Yang Mark Tan Chai Ming
Kelvin Chia Partnership	2 cases	Edwina Fan Elizabeth Lee Fan Yuen Chi Edwina Diana Ang
United Legal Alliance LLC	1 case	Michael Eu Hai Meng

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of BT Engineering Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.7
Complex Cases: 2 (33.3%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	33.0 parties avg	3.0	50.0%
Won	24.0 parties avg	4.0	33.3%
	15.0 parties avg	5.0	16.7%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2010	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2009	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2006	23.0 parties avg	3.0
2005	24.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of BT Engineering Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	2(33.3%)	33.3%
	1(16.7%)	16.7%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	163,029.51	40,757.384 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2006	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2005	2 11	Won: 1 cases (50.0%) : 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 6 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2010-sghc-240 17 Aug 2010	17 Aug 2010	Defendant	WonJudgment and costs on counterclaim for $163,029.51 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2009-sghc-172 29 Jul 2009	29 Jul 2009	Defendant	LostInterlocutory judgment awarded to the plaintiff against the second defendant. The judgment does not specify a monetary amount. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2006-sgca-43 15 Nov 2006	15 Nov 2006	Respondent	LostLiable for 40% of the damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2006-sgca-21 21 Jun 2006	21 Jun 2006	Respondent	LostThe court dismissed the respondent's arguments against adducing fresh evidence.
5	2005-sghc-223 04 Dec 2005	04 Dec 2005	Defendant	WonJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
6	2005-sghc-40 27 Feb 2005	27 Feb 2005	Other	Unknown