Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd

Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eldan Law LLP	4 cases	Daniel Koh
Rajah & Tann LLP	3 cases	Wendy Low Wei Ling Low Wei Ling Wendy

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Won	22.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Cargill International Trading Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	2(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,500.00	1,375.004 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sghc-35 15 Feb 2012	15 Feb 2012	Respondent	LostThe Respondent's cross-appeal was dismissed. The Respondent is to pay the Applicant its costs of these proceedings here and before the Tribunal, with such costs to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2011-sghc-71 28 Mar 2011	28 Mar 2011	Respondent	PartialCross-appeal against the Tribunal’s decision in the Amendment Proceedings is dismissed, except with regard to Claim 42 and consequently Claim 45 in the Proposed 2006 Amendments. The Respondent is ordered to pay the Applicant 95% of its costs for the hearing before the Tribunal and for the appeal before the High Court (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2010-sgca-51 27 Dec 2010	27 Dec 2010	Respondent	WonAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2010-sghc-135 02 May 2010	02 May 2010	Respondent	WonCosts of $5,500 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by the Applicant to the Respondents as costs of this application. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.