Chiang Sing Jeong
Chiang Sing Jeong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Chiang Sing Jeong has been represented by 4 law firms and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Mallal & Namazie | 1 case |
Kishan Law Chambers LLC | 1 case |
Ho Wong Law Practice LLC | 1 case |
Lim & Lim | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Chiang Sing Jeong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.5
- Complex Cases
- 2 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 13.0 parties avg |
Lost | 18.0 parties avg |
Withdrawn | 15.0 parties avg |
Won | 12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 12.0 parties avg |
2017 | 13.0 parties avg |
2013 | 15.0 parties avg |
2010 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Chiang Sing Jeong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Dismissed | 1(25.0%) |
Lost | 1(25.0%) |
Withdrawn | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 30,000.001 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 1 1 |
2017 | 1 1 |
2013 | 1 1 |
2010 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
29 Mar 2020 | Respondent, Defendant | WonAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 (all-in) to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
14 Aug 2017 | Defendant | DismissedThe defendant's counterclaim for return of deposit was dismissed. |
04 Jul 2013 | Plaintiff | WithdrawnAction discontinued after settling dispute with MDG on confidential terms. |
28 Feb 2010 | Plaintiff | LostAppeal against the order for Treasure to make discovery of documents was dismissed. |