Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering)

Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 33.3% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Eldan Law LLP	2 cases	Edwin Lee Poonaam Bai d/o Ramakrishnan Gnanasekaran Edwin Lee Peng Khoon Joni Tan

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	22.0 parties avg	2.0	66.7%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	33.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(66.7%)	66.7%
Won	1(33.3%)	33.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sgca-63 01 Nov 2012	01 Nov 2012	Respondent, Appellant	WonChua Say Eng's appeal was allowed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2011-sghc-109 28 Apr 2011	28 Apr 2011	Plaintiff, Respondent	LostAppeal allowed in favour of the defendant. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs and disbursements to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2010-sghc-333 10 Nov 2010	10 Nov 2010	Plaintiff	LostThe defendant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.