Edwin Lee

Edwin Lee is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2024. The lawyer has handled 30 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in construction law and property law. Their track record shows a 47.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 5 complex cases, representing 17% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Edwin Lee has demonstrated expertise across 81 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and construction law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	19 cases	11% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 19 cases which represents 11% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	13 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 13 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	10 cases	6% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 10 cases which represents 6% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	9 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice46% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	7 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced73% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Property Law	6 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized76% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	5 cases	3% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	5 cases	3% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Easements	4 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced74% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Res Judicata	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized82% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adverse Possession	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced63% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Guarantee	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Rights of way	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized88% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Promissory estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Measurement contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration of Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Factual Possession	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Intention to Possess	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Animus Possidendi	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building Contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Claims by sub-contractor	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Security of Payment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Director's Authority	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Extinguishment	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Architects Liability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Default Judgement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Share Acquisition Agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collective Sales	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Collections	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction Adjudication	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dispute Resolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Property Damage	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Strata Title Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workers Compensation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Issue Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Waiver	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Stay of Proceedings	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Duty of Care	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Edwin Lee has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Edwin Lee has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 11 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Eldan Law LLP	11 cases	37% of cases	CGS Construction v Quek & Quek: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOPA(Jul 2024) Audi Construction v. Kian Hiap Construction: Security of Payment Act & Validity of Payment Claims(Jan 2018) Mansource Interior v CSG Group: Overpayment Dispute in Construction Subcontracts(Mar 2017)
Rajah and Tann	8 cases	27% of cases	Yee Hong Pte Ltd v Tan Chye Hee Andrew: Stay of Proceedings and Arbitration in Construction Dispute(Aug 2005) Yee Hong v Powen: Arbitrator Removal for Improper Conduct in Construction Arbitration(Jun 2005) TR Networks v Elixir Health: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Guarantee & Indemnity Claims(May 2005)
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	13% of cases	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Order for Failure to Comply with Companies Act(Dec 2007) Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Application Under Companies Act(Jun 2007) Grange Heights MCST v Lee Tat: Right of Way Dispute Over Servient Tenement(Mar 2007)
Rajah & Tann LLP	3 cases	10% of cases	SEF Construction v Skoy Connected: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute(Nov 2009) Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth v Goh Kok Hwa Richard: Collective Sale Approval Appeal(May 2009) Lee Tat v MCST Plan No 301: Easement Extinguishment & Right of Way Dispute(Nov 2008)
CTLC Law Corporation	2 cases	7% of cases	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong: Negligence, Duty of Support & Building Damage(Nov 2003) Li Hwee v Advanced Construction: Wrongful Repudiation of Sub-Contract Dispute(Dec 2002)
Chong Yeo & Partners	2 cases	7% of cases	Grandlink Group Pte Ltd Insolvency: Internationale Container Transport GmbH v Grandlink Group Pte Ltd(Jul 2001) L & W Building Construction v King Wah Construction: Defective Works Dispute(Nov 2000)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Edwin Lee's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.4
Complex Cases: 5 (17%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	112.6 parties avg	2.6	37%
Neutral	12.0 parties avg	2.0	3%
Partial	35.7 parties avg	5.7	10%
Stayed	13.0 parties avg	3.0	3%
Won	143.6 parties avg	3.6	47%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2004	45.3 parties avg	5.3
2005	44.0 parties avg	4.0
2006	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2007	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	25.8 parties avg	5.8
2010	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2014	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2017	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2018	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2024	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Edwin Lee's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	11(37%)	37%
Neutral	1(3%)	3%
Partial	3(10%)	10%
Stayed	1(3%)	3%
Won	14(47%)	47%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	924,530.53	51,362.8118 cases	18

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2005	4 1111	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Stayed: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2006	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2007	3 12	Neutral: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 2 cases (66.7%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2010	3 21	Lost: 2 cases (66.7%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2014	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2024	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 30 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	CGS Construction v Quek & Quek: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under SOPA 15 Jul 2024 CGS Construction Pte Ltd (Claimant)Won	15 Jul 2024	CGS Construction Pte Ltd (Claimant): Application dismissedApplication to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.
2	Audi Construction v. Kian Hiap Construction: Security of Payment Act & Validity of Payment Claims 21 Jan 2018 Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	21 Jan 2018	Kian Hiap Construction Pte Ltd (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs fixed at $20,000 inclusive of disbursements to be paid (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Mansource Interior v CSG Group: Overpayment Dispute in Construction Subcontracts 07 Mar 2017 Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim)Won	07 Mar 2017	Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the plaintiff in the amount of $904,530.53 (including goods and services tax). Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	Ang Cheng Guan Construction v Corporate Residence: Adjudication Review Scope under Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 23 Jan 2017 Ang Cheng Guan Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	23 Jan 2017	Ang Cheng Guan Construction Pte Ltd (Applicant): Adjudication Review Determination set asideAdjudication Review Determination set aside, with costs to be paid by CR to ACG. Costs are to be taxed if not agreed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
5	Bounty Resources Armenia Ltd v Li Haidong: Default Judgment & Director's Authority 20 Jul 2015 Bounty Resources Armenia Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Won	20 Jul 2015	Bounty Resources Armenia Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	Mansource Interior v Citiwall Safety Glass: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Under SOP Act 24 Apr 2014 Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	24 Apr 2014	Mansource Interior Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs fixed at $5,000 inclusive of disbursement (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	Chua June Ching Michelle v Chai Hoi Tong: Adverse Possession Claim Over Amoy Street Property 28 Jul 2011 Chua June Ching Michelle (Plaintiff)Won	28 Jul 2011	Chua June Ching Michelle (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffThe Plaintiff was declared the owner of the property and the Registrar of Titles was ordered to register her as the proprietor of the Property.
8	Chua Say Eng v Lee Wee Lick Terence: SOPA Adjudication Determination Dispute 28 Apr 2011 Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	28 Apr 2011	Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed in favour of the defendant. The plaintiff was ordered to pay costs and disbursements to the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
9	JBE Properties v Gammon: Interim Injunction Against Performance Bond Call Due to Unconscionability 02 Dec 2010 JBE Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	02 Dec 2010	JBE Properties Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal dismissed in partAppeal against the grant of the Interim Injunction was dismissed, but the Ancillary Orders were set aside.
10	Chua Say Eng v Lee Wee Lick Terence: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination under Security of Payment Act 10 Nov 2010 Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff)Lost	10 Nov 2010	Chua Say Eng (formerly trading as Weng Fatt Construction Engineering) (Plaintiff): Application dismissedThe defendant's application to set aside the adjudication determination was dismissed.
11	Re Win-Win Aluminium Systems: Application for Scheme of Arrangement under Companies Act 07 Oct 2010 Re Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd (Applicant)Partial	07 Oct 2010	Re Win-Win Aluminium Systems Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application conditionally grantedApplication to convene a meeting of creditors for a scheme of arrangement was conditionally granted, requiring the company to provide security or pay the outstanding costs to Tavica Design Pte Ltd. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	SEF Construction v Skoy Connected: Security of Payment Act Adjudication Dispute 16 Nov 2009 SEF Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Lost	16 Nov 2009	SEF Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The court found no basis to set aside the adjudication determination.
13	Lim Choo Suan Elizabeth v Goh Kok Hwa Richard: Collective Sale Approval Appeal 11 May 2009 Lee Choon Kum Beatrice (Respondent)Won	11 May 2009	Lee Choon Kum Beatrice (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the decision of the Strata Titles Board approving the collective sale of the development was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
14	Lee Tat v MCST Plan No 301: Easement Extinguishment & Right of Way Dispute 30 Nov 2008 Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 (Respondent)Lost	30 Nov 2008	Management Corporation Strata Title Plan No 301 (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; the MC is not entitled to repair and/or maintain the Right of Way.
15	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Order for Failure to Comply with Companies Act 27 Dec 2007 Lau Yu Man (Plaintiff)Won	27 Dec 2007	Lau Yu Man (Plaintiff): Application GrantedThe plaintiff's application to wind up the company was granted.
16	Lau Yu Man v Wellmix Organics: Winding Up Application Under Companies Act 19 Jun 2007 Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Neutral	19 Jun 2007	Wellmix Organics (International) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application adjournedApplication for winding up adjourned with conditions to file audited accounts within four months, to rectify all previous breaches and comply with the requirements of the Act.
17	Grange Heights MCST v Lee Tat: Right of Way Dispute Over Servient Tenement 04 Mar 2007 Management Corporation of Grange Heights Strata Title No 301 (Plaintiff)Won	04 Mar 2007	Management Corporation of Grange Heights Strata Title No 301 (Plaintiff): Declaration GrantedDeclaration granted that the plaintiff was entitled to repair and/or maintain the right of way at its own expense, subject to obtaining such regulatory approval as may be required.
18	Aloe Vera v Asianic: Enforcing Foreign Arbitration Award in Singapore 09 May 2006 Chiew Chee Boon (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	09 May 2006	Chiew Chee Boon (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal dismissedAppeal dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (Singapore) is assumed.
19	Yee Hong Pte Ltd v Tan Chye Hee Andrew: Stay of Proceedings and Arbitration in Construction Dispute 30 Aug 2005 Yee Hong Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Stayed	30 Aug 2005	Yee Hong Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Proceedings StayedProceedings stayed and referred to arbitration.
20	Yee Hong v Powen: Arbitrator Removal for Improper Conduct in Construction Arbitration 30 Jun 2005 Yee Hong Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	30 Jun 2005	Yee Hong Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application DismissedApplication to remove arbitrator dismissed with costs fixed at $15,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	TR Networks v Elixir Health: Appeal on Setting Aside Default Judgment for Guarantee & Indemnity Claims 30 May 2005 Chiew Chee Boon Steven (Respondent)Partial	30 May 2005	Chiew Chee Boon Steven (Respondent): Assistant registrar’s order variedAssistant registrar’s order varied by adding the condition that the fifth defendant provide security for the sums claimed, either by way of banker’s guarantee or in such other form as may be agreed between the parties, within 21 days and that in default thereof, the plaintiffs be at liberty to enter judgment against him for the said sums. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Lee Tat v Management Corp: Issue Estoppel & Right of Way Dispute 11 Apr 2005 Management Corporation of Grange Heights Strata Title No 301 (Respondent)Won	11 Apr 2005	Management Corporation of Grange Heights Strata Title No 301 (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs; security deposit released to the respondent to account for its costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
23	Master Contract Services Pte Ltd v Sevugan Kalyanasundaram: Workmen's Compensation for Permanent Incapacity 12 Dec 2004 Master Contract Services Pte Ltd (Applicant)Lost	12 Dec 2004	Master Contract Services Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application dismissedMaster Contract Services Pte Ltd's application to set aside or vary the decision of the Commissioner of Labour was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
24	Lee Tat Development v Management Corp: Issue Estoppel & Right of Way Dispute 27 Sep 2004 Management Corporation of Grange Heights Strata Title No 301 (Defendant, Respondent)Won	27 Sep 2004	Management Corporation of Grange Heights Strata Title No 301 (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment in favor of Management CorporationThe court found that Lee Tat was estopped from claiming the main reliefs sought, resulting in a judgment in favor of the Management Corporation.
25	Eastern Pretech v Kin Lin Builders: Winding Up Order & Scheme of Arrangement 02 Sep 2004 Eastern Pretech Pte Ltd (Applicant, Supporting Creditor)Won	02 Sep 2004	Eastern Pretech Pte Ltd (Applicant, Supporting Creditor): Substitution as petitioning creditor allowedEastern Pretech Pte Ltd was allowed to be substituted as the petitioning creditor.
26	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong Investment: Costs Allocation for Trevi & CKK after Partially Successful Claim 20 May 2004 Chin Kok Kwong Design and Build Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	20 May 2004	Chin Kok Kwong Design and Build Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial WinCKK was awarded 85% of their costs of defending the plaintiffs' claim with respect to liability. The costs of assessment will be determined by the Registrar. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
27	Afro-Asia Shipping v Da Zhong: Negligence, Duty of Support & Building Damage 20 Nov 2003 Chin Kok Kwong Design & Build Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	20 Nov 2003	Chin Kok Kwong Design & Build Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment against Defendant in partJudgment against the defendant for damages to be assessed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
28	Li Hwee v Advanced Construction: Wrongful Repudiation of Sub-Contract Dispute 02 Dec 2002 Advanced Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	02 Dec 2002	Advanced Construction & Engineering Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29	Grandlink Group Pte Ltd Insolvency: Internationale Container Transport GmbH v Grandlink Group Pte Ltd 03 Jul 2001 Grandlink Group Pte Ltd (Respondent)Lost	03 Jul 2001	Grandlink Group Pte Ltd (Respondent): Petition GrantedPetition to wind up Grandlink Group Pte Ltd was granted. No monetary amount was specified in the outcome. Assumed currency is SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	L & W Building Construction v King Wah Construction: Defective Works Dispute 22 Nov 2000 L & W Building Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant)Won	22 Nov 2000	L & W Building Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed, stay of proceedings ordered pending arbitration.