CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Limited)

CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Limited) is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Limited) has been represented by 1 law firm and 8 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Teo Chun-Wei Benedict Poon Guokun Nicholas Tan Ben Mathias Hri Kumar Nair Ben Mathias Tan Shivani d/o Sivasagthy Retnam Zhao Liwen Constance Joseph Yeo

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Limited)'s case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.5
Complex Cases: 3 (75.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	36.0 parties avg	6.0	75.0%
Won	18.0 parties avg	8.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2017	27.5 parties avg	7.5
2015	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2014	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of CIFG Special Assets Capital I Ltd (formerly known as Diamond Kendall Limited)'s case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	3(75.0%)	75.0%
Won	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2017	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2017-sgca-70 28 Nov 2017	28 Nov 2017	Appellant, Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed; the court found that the indemnity clause did not make each party responsible for the breach of any term of the contract. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2017-sghc-22 07 Feb 2017	07 Feb 2017	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim against the Initial Shareholders for the outstanding sums owing by Polimet under Clause 12.1 of the CBSAs is dismissed.
3	2015-sghc-325 22 Dec 2015	22 Dec 2015	Plaintiff, Appellant	WonPlaintiff's appeal was allowed with costs.
4	2014-sghcr-8 15 Apr 2014	15 Apr 2014	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's application for summary judgment was dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).