Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd
Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 4 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
PRP Law LLC | 1 case |
WongPartnership LLP | 1 case |
Shook Lin & Bok LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 8.6
- Complex Cases
- 5 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 19.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 18.0 parties avg |
Won | 38.7 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 19.0 parties avg |
2020 | 29.0 parties avg |
2019 | 18.0 parties avg |
2018 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(20.0%) |
Neutral | 1(20.0%) |
Won | 3(60.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
USD | 70,006,122.491 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 1 1 |
2020 | 1 2 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 5 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
25 Mar 2021 | Respondent | LostThe first to seventh respondents were ordered to be jointly and severally liable to the appellant for the total sum of US$70,006,122.49 and S$131,817.80. Assumed USD as the judgment refers to USD amounts. |
31 May 2020 | Respondent | WonApplication to reinstate Mareva injunction against Cougar Pacific Pte Ltd dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Feb 2020 | Defendant | WonJudgment for the Defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |
31 Jan 2019 | Defendant | NeutralNo specific outcome for this party is mentioned in the judgment extract. |
22 Feb 2018 | Defendant | WonDefendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was allowed. |