Diamond Glass Enterprise Pte Ltd

Diamond Glass Enterprise Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 2 law firms.

Legal Representation

Diamond Glass Enterprise Pte Ltd has been represented by 2 law firms and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
TSMP Law Corporation	2 cases	Chan Kah Keen Melvin Yong Wei Jie Timothy
Luo Ling Ling LLC	2 cases	Luo Ling Ling Sharifah Nabilah Binte Syed Omar

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Diamond Glass Enterprise Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Partial	42.0 parties avg	2.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2023	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2021	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Diamond Glass Enterprise Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Partial	4(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,070.00	1,690.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2023	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	1 2	Partial: 2 cases (200.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2023-sghca-20 30 May 2023	30 May 2023	Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim	PartialAppeal allowed in part; supplementary orders made regarding costs and payments. No specific monetary amount awarded.
2	2022-sghca-44 22 Dec 2022	22 Dec 2022	Appellant, Plaintiff in counterclaim, Respondent	PartialDG's appeal in respect of LD awarded to ZK is allowed in part and the $356,400 LD awarded to ZK for Phase 1 works is reduced by $165,600 to $190,800; DG’s appeal against the award of $5,906.40 to ZK in respect of ZK’s claim for replacement and rectification works, is allowed, and this award is accordingly set aside; DG’s appeal against the dismissal of its counterclaim for payments in respect of VO 6 (ie, the sum of $32,602.50) is allowed, and DG is awarded this sum; DG’s appeal against the dismissal of its counterclaim for payments in respect of VO 8 (ie, the sum of $13,185) is allowed, and DG is awarded this sum; DG’s appeal against the dismissal of its counterclaim for the Retention Sum (ie, the sum of $27,902.75) is allowed, and DG is awarded this sum.
3	2021-sghc-277 01 Dec 2021	01 Dec 2021	Defendant, Plaintiff in counterclaim	PartialOne of the defendant's claim for variation order allowed; defendant's other claims dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2021-sgca-61 20 Jun 2021	20 Jun 2021	Appellant, Applicant	PartialAppeal dismissed with variation; stay of winding-up petition conditional upon payment into court. The judgment does not specify a currency, so the currency of the jurisdiction (SGD) is assumed.