E

E is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 4 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 75.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

E has been represented by 4 law firms and 7 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Netto Tan and S Magin	1 case	S Magintharan
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Raeza Ibrahim Grace Morgan Mahesh Rai
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Alvin Yeo SC Sim Bok Eng
Independent Practitioner	1 case	E

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of E's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.3
Complex Cases: 3 (75.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	15.0 parties avg	5.0	25.0%
Partial	24.0 parties avg	4.0	50.0%
	14.0 parties avg	4.0	25.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2009	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of E's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Partial	2(50.0%)	50.0%
	1(25.0%)	25.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2013	1 1	: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sghcr-9 19 Jun 2018	19 Jun 2018	Defendant	LostApplication for stay of proceedings denied.
2	2013-sghc-138 18 Jul 2013	18 Jul 2013	Respondent	Unknown
3	2009-sghc-220 27 Sep 2009	27 Sep 2009	Intervener	PartialThe court agreed that the gift had lapsed but disagreed with the 4th Intervener's construction that the lapsed gift passes as on an intestacy. The interveners are to bear their own costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2003-sghc-265 28 Oct 2003	28 Oct 2003	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part; the District Judge’s order granting sole custody of K to O was set aside and no order was made in relation to custody. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.