S Magintharan

S Magintharan is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2000 to 2025. The lawyer has handled 42 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 7 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in breach of contract and legal ethics and professional responsibility. Their track record shows a 25.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 4 complex cases, representing 10% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

S Magintharan has demonstrated expertise across 170 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and breach of contract.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	33 cases	10% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 33 cases which represents 10% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	17 cases	5% of total caseload	Highly Specialized77% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 17 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	12 cases	4% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 12 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Construction Law	11 cases	3% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 11 cases which represents 3% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	7 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced71% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Property Law	7 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice23% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 7 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Company Law	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Evidence	6 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Damages	6 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Employment Law	5 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced69% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Costs	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced61% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Civil Practice	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Family Law	4 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized91% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	4 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice24% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 4 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance	3 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Summary Judgement	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance of Contract	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Statutory Interpretation	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice43% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice33% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	3 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice38% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Adjudication	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Contracts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Business Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice27% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Performance Bond	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced53% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Injunctions	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced58% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice37% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized86% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Wife)	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Maintenance (Child)	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Unjust Enrichment	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Legal Profession Act	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Conversion	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized78% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Children's Welfare	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Succession Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Matrimonial Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Division of Assets	2 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized93% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of contractual terms	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Workplace Safety and Health	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Best Efforts Clause	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Sham Contract	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Societies Law	2 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Jurisdiction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abetment by instigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings (Lawyers)	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Disciplinary Proceedings	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Touting	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Arbitration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contractual terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Causation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Natural justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Admissibility of evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Duty of fidelity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Procedure	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Overcharging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Assessment of Legal Costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Prevention of Corruption Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
International Arbitration Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Abuse of Process	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Extension of Time	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Oral Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Implied Terms	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Settlement Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Employment of Foreign Manpower Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Petrochemical Products	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Restitution	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Industry Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Statutory Demand	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Ancillary Matters	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tertiary Education Expenses	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Commodities	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Grossly Improper Conduct	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Civil Litigation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Judgments and Orders	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Anticipatory Breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Options to purchase	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Support	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Child Custody	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Chancery and Equity	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Management Committee	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Proper Notice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Bailment	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Asset Recovery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Show cause action	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Rules of Association	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Without Prejudice Privilege	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Referral fees	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conveyancing work	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wash Out Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mitigation of damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Adjudication Determination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Demurrage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Remoteness of damage	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Sale of Goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Appellate Practice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Variation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interest	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts (Rights of Third Parties) Act	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gifts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Beneficial Ownership	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice35% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Breach of Solicitors' Accounts Rules	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Detinue	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Construction of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Personal liability of solicitor for costs	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Nominal damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Palm Oil Trading	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Interpretation of Contracts	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Entire Agreement Clause	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2004	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Offer and Acceptance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiatory breach	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts for sale and supply of goods	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Professional Remuneration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Striking out notice of appeal	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Repudiation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Contracts procured by bribery	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conditions Precedent	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unilateral Offer	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estoppel by Convention	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Obstructing, preventing, perverting or defeating course of justice	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Mixed statement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Warranties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cheating by Personation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice15% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Termination of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unlicensed Moneylender	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Tertiary Education	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insurance	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Legal Ethics	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized95% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wills and Probate	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Work Injury Compensation	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Wrongful Termination	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice5% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
False Evidence	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Convertible Loan Agreement	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Erinford Injunction	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Unconscionability	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Care and Control	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Access to Children	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	0% of total caseload	General Practice45% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Estate Administration	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Gross overcharging	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized100% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Divorce	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Convertible Loan Agreements	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Inducement of Breach of Contract	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Conspiracy by Unlawful Means	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Criminal Law	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Measure of Damages	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.
Cross-Default	1 cases	0% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	S Magintharan has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 0% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

S Magintharan has been affiliated with 7 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 28 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Essex LLC	28 cases	67% of cases	Ee Hup Construction v China Jingye: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability(Feb 2025) Dongah Geological Engineering v Jungwoo E&C: Striking Out Appeal for Abuse of Process in SOPA Adjudication(Jan 2022) Backho (S) Pte Ltd v KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd: SOPA Dispute over Oral Contract and Adjudication Determination(Jan 2022)
Netto Tan & S Magin	4 cases	10% of cases	Purwadi v Ung Hooi Leng: Setting Aside Default Judgment for $1.6 Million Cheque(Sep 2003) Chua Ah Beng v Commissioner For Labour: Judicial Review & Workmen's Compensation Claim(Aug 2002) Chua Ah Beng v C & P Holdings: Employee's Fall from Crane & Employer's Liability(May 2001)
S Magin & Co	3 cases	7% of cases	Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute(Aug 2010) Sungdo Engineering v Italcor: Setting Aside Adjudication Order for Lack of Valid Payment Claim(Apr 2010) Fu Yuan Foodstuff v Methodist Welfare: Breach of Contract & Employment Law Compliance(Jun 2009)
Netto & Magin LLC	3 cases	7% of cases	Fu Yuan v Methodist Welfare: Breach of Contract & Illegal Foreign Worker Deployment(Oct 2008) Law Society v Liew Boon Kwee: Show Cause Action for Improperly Procuring Conveyancing Work(Dec 2007) Sin Lian Heng Construction v Singapore Telecommunications: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications(Feb 2007)
Netto Tan and S Magin	2 cases	5% of cases	Re G: Guardianship of Infant - Custody Dispute Between Parents(Oct 2003) Tan Soo Giem v Yeo Ching Chua: Extension of Time to File Leave to Appeal in Subordinate Courts(Oct 2003)
S Magin	1 cases	2% of cases	Karuppannrgounder Paramasivam v Kearns Pte Ltd: Wash Out Contracts Dispute(Oct 2003)
Essex LCC	1 cases	2% of cases	UYT v UYU: Appeal on Child Maintenance for Overseas University Education(Mar 2020)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of S Magintharan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 3.2
Complex Cases: 4 (10%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	25.0 parties avg	5.0	5%
Lost	223.5 parties avg	3.5	52%
Partial	92.0 parties avg	2.0	21%
Won	112.5 parties avg	2.5	26%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2000	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	13.0 parties avg	3.0
2003	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2007	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	45.0 parties avg	5.0
2013	42.0 parties avg	2.0
2014	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	16.0 parties avg	6.0
2016	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2017	34.0 parties avg	4.0
2018	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2019	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2020	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2021	32.0 parties avg	2.0
2022	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2025	13.0 parties avg	3.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of S Magintharan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	2(5%)	5%
Lost	22(50%)	50%
Partial	9(20%)	20%
Won	11(25%)	25%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	5,694,905.49	189,830.1830 cases	30

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2000	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2001	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2003	4 112	Lost: 1 cases (25.0%) Partial: 1 cases (25.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2007	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2009	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Partial: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2011	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2012	4 4	Lost: 4 cases (100.0%)
2013	4 31	Partial: 3 cases (75.0%) Won: 1 cases (25.0%)
2014	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2015	2 11	Dismissed: 1 cases (50.0%) Lost: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2017	4 22	Lost: 2 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (50.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	2 2	Lost: 2 cases (100.0%)
2020	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2021	3 111	Lost: 1 cases (33.3%) Partial: 1 cases (33.3%) Won: 1 cases (33.3%)
2022	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2025	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 42 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Ee Hup Construction v China Jingye: Performance Bond Call & Unconscionability 10 Feb 2025 Ee Hup Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	10 Feb 2025	Ee Hup Construction Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $35,000 to the first respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	Dongah Geological Engineering v Jungwoo E&C: Striking Out Appeal for Abuse of Process in SOPA Adjudication 20 Jan 2022 Jungwoo E&C Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant)Lost	20 Jan 2022	Jungwoo E&C Pte Ltd (Respondent, Defendant): Appeal struck outNotice of appeal in CA/CA 62/2021 struck out; Jungwoo’s counsel to bear costs of $12,000 personally (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	Backho (S) Pte Ltd v KSE Marine Works Pte Ltd: SOPA Dispute over Oral Contract and Adjudication Determination 16 Jan 2022 Backho (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent)Won	16 Jan 2022	Backho (S) Pte Ltd (Respondent): Application to set aside the Adjudication Determination and the Order is dismissedKSE's application to set aside the Adjudication Determination and the Order is dismissed.
4	Dongah Geological Engineering v Jungwoo E&C: SOPA Adjudication, Fraud Allegations & Stay of Enforcement 21 Oct 2021 Jungwoo E&C Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	21 Oct 2021	Jungwoo E&C Pte Ltd (Defendant): Partial Stay of Enforcement GrantedThe court granted a partial stay of enforcement of the adjudication determination, releasing $1,205,565.01 to the defendant. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of the jurisdiction.
5	Nambu PVD v UBTS: Exclusion Clauses & Contractual Terms in Machine Transport 19 Oct 2021 Nambu PVD Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff)Lost	19 Oct 2021	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd (Appellant, Plaintiff): Appeal DismissedNambu's appeal regarding the quantum of damages and costs awarded was dismissed.
6	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd v UBTS Pte Ltd: Negligence, Bailment, Contractual Exclusion Clauses & Fire Damage 01 Feb 2021 Nambu PVD Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	01 Feb 2021	Nambu PVD Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment for PlaintiffJudgment for the Plaintiff; damages awarded in the amount of $248,240.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
7	UYT v UYU: Appeal on Child Maintenance for Overseas University Education 23 Mar 2020 UYU (Respondent)Lost	23 Mar 2020	UYU (Respondent): Appeal DismissedThe respondent's application for the appellant to pay for his university education in Canada was dismissed.
8	Law Society v Dhanwant Singh: Disciplinary Proceedings for Breach of Conveyancing Rules 19 Dec 2019 Dhanwant Singh (Respondent)Lost	19 Dec 2019	Dhanwant Singh (Respondent): Fine ImposedThe court imposed a fine of $50,000 on the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
9	Ahmad Ebrahim v Ilangchizian Manogaran: Breach of Oral Agreement & Undue Influence 14 Jul 2019 Ahmad Ebrahim s/o S M E Mohamed Sadik (Plaintiff)Lost	14 Jul 2019	Ahmad Ebrahim s/o S M E Mohamed Sadik (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claims for breach of contract, restitution, breach of trust, breach of fiduciary duty, misrepresentation, and undue influence were all dismissed.
10	Sea-Shore Transportation v Technik-Soil: Conversion & Damages for Equipment Disposal 23 Oct 2018 Technik-Soil (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	23 Oct 2018	Technik-Soil (Asia) Pte Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for Defendant on CounterclaimJudgment for Defendant on Counterclaim; damages awarded in the amount of $60,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Fisher v. Sunho Construction: Setting Aside Arbitral Award for Breach of Natural Justice and Public Policy 28 Mar 2018 Fisher, Stephen J (Plaintiff)Lost	28 Mar 2018	Fisher, Stephen J (Plaintiff): Application DismissedPlaintiff's application to set aside the arbitral award was dismissed.
12	Tembusu Growth Fund Ltd v ACTAtek, Inc: Damages for Anticipatory Breach of Contract and Loss of IPO Opportunity 18 Oct 2017 WAN WAH TONG THOMAS (Defendant)Lost	18 Oct 2017	WAN WAH TONG THOMAS (Defendant): LostCounterclaim dismissed; ordered to pay S$20,000 in costs to Tembusu (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
13	Lakshmi Anil Salgaocar v Vivek Sudarshan Khabya: Striking Out Action & Standing to Sue Without Letters of Administration 25 May 2017 Vivek Sudarshan Khabya (Defendant, Respondent)Won	25 May 2017	Vivek Sudarshan Khabya (Defendant, Respondent): Judgment for DefendantJudgment for the Defendant; costs in respect of Registrar's Appeal No 13 to be paid by the plaintiff to the defendant, to be taxed if not agreed. No order as to costs for Registrar's Appeal No 31. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14	Wilson Taylor v Dyna-Jet: Stay of Proceedings for Arbitration 25 Apr 2017 Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	25 Apr 2017	Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed with costs of $30,000 awarded to the Respondent (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
15	Dyna-Jet v Wilson Taylor: Arbitration Agreement, Stay of Proceedings, International Arbitration Act 30 Oct 2016 Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	30 Oct 2016	Wilson Taylor Asia Pacific Pte Ltd (Defendant, Appellant): Stay application dismissedStay application dismissed; ordered to pay costs of $2,000 to Plaintiff (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
16	ACTAtek v Tembusu: Misrepresentation, Implied Terms & Breach of Contract in Convertible Loan Agreements 16 Aug 2016 WAN WAH TONG THOMAS (Appellant)Won	16 Aug 2016	WAN WAH TONG THOMAS (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court overturned the Judge’s findings that the Appellants were liable in the tort of deceit and that the Appellants had breached an implied term of the 2012 CLA.
17	Tembusu Growth Fund v ACTAtek: Fraudulent Misrepresentation & Breach of Contract 04 Aug 2015 THOMROSE HOLDINGS (BVI) LTD (Defendant)Dismissed	04 Aug 2015	THOMROSE HOLDINGS (BVI) LTD (Defendant): Claim DismissedClaim dismissed against Thomrose Holdings (BVI) Ltd.
18	Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee: Division of Matrimonial Assets and Maintenance 10 Apr 2014 Thery Patrice Roger (Appellant)Partial	10 Apr 2014	Thery Patrice Roger (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partThe husband's appeal was allowed in part, resulting in a revised division of matrimonial assets. He was awarded 45% of the net sale proceeds of the Loyang View property, amounting to $425,483.29 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
19	Tan Poh Choo Joscelyn v Tan Poh Seng: Trust Beneficiary Dispute Over Gifted Shares 05 Feb 2014 Tan Poh Seng (Defendant)Lost	05 Feb 2014	Tan Poh Seng (Defendant): Claim DismissedThe first defendant's claim to the 1/9th share of the 950 account was dismissed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
20	Bridgeman Pte Ltd v Dukim International Pte Ltd: Breach of Contract for Automotive Diesel Oil Supply 23 Oct 2013 Dukim International Pte Ltd (Defendant)Partial	23 Oct 2013	Dukim International Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedInterlocutory judgment on its counterclaim with damages to be assessed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21	Thery Patrice Roger v Tan Chye Tee: Division of Matrimonial Assets & Child Maintenance 26 Sep 2013 Thery Patrice Roger (Plaintiff, Appellant)Partial	26 Sep 2013	Thery Patrice Roger (Plaintiff, Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe Husband's appeal was allowed in part by the Court of Appeal on 11 April 2014 with regard to the issue of the division of matrimonial assets and maintenance for the children’s education. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
22	Law Society v Udeh Kumar: Solicitor's Duty, Conflict of Interest & Communication with Client 27 Jun 2013 UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent)Partial	27 Jun 2013	UDEH KUMAR S/O SETHURAJU (Respondent): Partial LossThe Respondent was found guilty of the Second and Third Charges and was suspended from practice for three months.
23	Admin Construction v Vivaldi: Setting Aside Adjudication Determination Based on Settlement Agreement 02 May 2013 Admin Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	02 May 2013	Admin Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application to set aside the adjudication determination allowed.The court allowed Admin Construction's application to set aside the adjudication determination.
24	Law Society v Ang Chin Peng: Disciplinary Action for Gross Overcharging in Estate Matters 25 Nov 2012 DeCruz Martin Francis (Respondent)Lost	25 Nov 2012	DeCruz Martin Francis (Respondent): SuspensionSuspended for three months and ordered to pay costs.
25	Foo Jong Peng v Phua Kiah Mai: Power to Remove Office Bearers in Singapore Hainan Hwee Kuan Management Committee 07 Oct 2012 Pang Fui Nam (Appellant)Lost	07 Oct 2012	Pang Fui Nam (Appellant): Appeal DismissedAppeal dismissed; costs of $25,000 fixed in favor of the Respondents (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
26	Republic Airconditioning v Shinsung Eng: Summary Judgment for Labour Charges Dispute 05 Mar 2012 Shinsung Eng Co Ltd (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Appellant)Lost	05 Mar 2012	Shinsung Eng Co Ltd (Singapore Branch) (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe defendant's appeal against the summary judgment was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27	Phua Kiah Mai v Foo Jong Peng: Challenge to Removal of Association Leaders 18 Jan 2012 Foo Jong Peng (Defendant)Lost	18 Jan 2012	Foo Jong Peng (Defendant): Applications dismissedThe plaintiffs' applications in this Originating Summons are allowed against the defendants.
28	Azuma Engineering v MEP Systems: Option to Purchase & JTC Lease Extension Dispute 06 Apr 2011 Azuma Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant)Won	06 Apr 2011	Azuma Engineering (S) Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed with costs.
29	Zac. T Engineering v GTMS Construction: Construction Subcontract Dispute over Payment and Repudiation 21 Mar 2011 Zac. T Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	21 Mar 2011	Zac. T Engineering Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Judgment against PlaintiffJudgment against the Plaintiff for $73,182.20 (including GST) after setting off the respective judgment sums. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
30	Sin Lian Heng Construction v. Singapore Telecommunications: Breach of Contract & Cable Recovery Dispute 01 Aug 2010 Sin Lian Heng Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	01 Aug 2010	Sin Lian Heng Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal Allowed in PartAppeal allowed in part, reducing the damages owed to Singtel. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
31	Sungdo Engineering v Italcor: Setting Aside Adjudication Order for Lack of Valid Payment Claim 06 Apr 2010 Sungdo Engineering & Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Won	06 Apr 2010	Sungdo Engineering & Construction (S) Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Application AllowedApplication to set aside the adjudication order was allowed. The defendant was ordered to pay the plaintiff costs fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
32	Fu Yuan Foodstuff v Methodist Welfare: Breach of Contract & Employment Law Compliance 01 Jun 2009 Fu Yuan Foodstuff Manufacturer Pte Ltd (Appellant)Lost	01 Jun 2009	Fu Yuan Foodstuff Manufacturer Pte Ltd (Appellant): Appeal DismissedThe appeal against the Judge’s decision was dismissed with costs and with the usual consequential orders.
33	Fu Yuan v Methodist Welfare: Breach of Contract & Illegal Foreign Worker Deployment 19 Oct 2008 Fu Yuan Foodstuff Manufacturer Pte Ltd (Plaintiff)Lost	19 Oct 2008	Fu Yuan Foodstuff Manufacturer Pte Ltd (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedPlaintiff's claim for damages for wrongful termination was dismissed with costs. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the currency of the jurisdiction.
34	Law Society v Liew Boon Kwee: Show Cause Action for Improperly Procuring Conveyancing Work 03 Dec 2007 Law Society of Singapore (Applicant)Won	03 Dec 2007	Law Society of Singapore (Applicant): Application grantedShow cause order made absolute; respondent suspended from practice for 12 months and ordered to pay costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
35	Sin Lian Heng Construction v Singapore Telecommunications: Admissibility of 'Without Prejudice' Communications 14 Feb 2007 Sin Lian Heng Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent)Partial	14 Feb 2007	Sin Lian Heng Construction Pte Ltd (Plaintiff, Respondent): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part by varying the decision of the learned Assistant Registrar in relation to paragraph 19(e) of the Defence and Counterclaim, and ordered that paragraph to be struck out. Costs be in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
36	Karuppannrgounder Paramasivam v Kearns Pte Ltd: Wash Out Contracts Dispute 28 Oct 2003 Kearns Pte Ltd (Defendant)Won	28 Oct 2003	Kearns Pte Ltd (Defendant): Counterclaim AllowedDefendant's counterclaims against the plaintiff were allowed with interest and costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
37	Re G: Guardianship of Infant - Custody Dispute Between Parents 28 Oct 2003 E (Appellant)Partial	28 Oct 2003	E (Appellant): Appeal allowed in partAppeal allowed in part; the District Judge’s order granting sole custody of K to O was set aside and no order was made in relation to custody. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
38	Tan Soo Giem v Yeo Ching Chua: Extension of Time to File Leave to Appeal in Subordinate Courts 27 Oct 2003 Yeo Ching Chua (Respondent)Won	27 Oct 2003	Yeo Ching Chua (Respondent): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; costs of $3,000 to be paid by the appellant (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
39	Purwadi v Ung Hooi Leng: Setting Aside Default Judgment for $1.6 Million Cheque 17 Sep 2003 Ung Hooi Leng (Appellant, Defendant)Lost	17 Sep 2003	Ung Hooi Leng (Appellant, Defendant): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the default judgment was dismissed with costs. The judgment amount was $1,600,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
40	Chua Ah Beng v Commissioner For Labour: Judicial Review & Workmen's Compensation Claim 29 Aug 2002 Chua Ah Beng (Applicant, Plaintiff)Lost	29 Aug 2002	Chua Ah Beng (Applicant, Plaintiff): Application DismissedApplication for orders of certiorari and mandamus dismissed.
41	Chua Ah Beng v C & P Holdings: Employee's Fall from Crane & Employer's Liability 07 May 2001 Chua Ah Beng (Plaintiff)Dismissed	07 May 2001	Chua Ah Beng (Plaintiff): Claim DismissedThe Plaintiff's claim was dismissed.
42	Public Prosecutor v Ng Ai Tiong: Abetment by Instigation to Give False Evidence in Civil Suit 02 Jan 2000 Ng Ai Tiong (Respondent)Lost	02 Jan 2000	Ng Ai Tiong (Respondent): Guilty as chargedNg Ai Tiong was found guilty as charged and sentenced to a term of one year's imprisonment.