Fourth defendant

Fourth defendant is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 13 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 8 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Fourth defendant has been represented by 5 law firms and 13 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Kelvin Poon Gregory Vijayendran Dhiviya Mohan Matthew Teo Ryan Loh Melissa Kue
Haridass Ho & Partners	1 case	Tan Boon Yong Thomas Ernita Osman
KhattarWong	1 case	Chan Kia Pheng Sharon Lin
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Josephine Choo Quek Kian Teck
Ng Ong & Chee	1 case	Chee Wai Pong

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fourth defendant's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.9
Complex Cases: 8 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Dismissed	114.0 parties avg	14.0	12.5%
Lost	35.0 parties avg	5.0	37.5%
Won	46.5 parties avg	6.5	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2015	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2014	35.7 parties avg	5.7
2011	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2010	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2001	114.0 parties avg	14.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fourth defendant's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Dismissed	1(12.5%)	12.5%
Lost	3(37.5%)	37.5%
Won	4(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	600,000.00	120,000.005 cases	5

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2015	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	2 12	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2001	1 1	Dismissed: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2015-sghc-195 26 Jul 2015	26 Jul 2015	Defendant	WonThe court declined to grant a Mareva injunction against the fourth defendant.
2	2014-sghc-239 13 Nov 2014	13 Nov 2014	Defendant	LostThe court granted the plaintiff's application to inspect the accounting and other records of the Company. The defendants were ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs of the application fixed at $3,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2014-sghc-81 20 Apr 2014	20 Apr 2014	Defendant	WonThe appeal against the assistant registrar’s decision to dismiss the plaintiffs’ application for security for costs was dismissed. The court ordered that costs here and below will be costs in the cause. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2014-sghcr-6 10 Mar 2014	10 Mar 2014	Defendant	WonThe defendant successfully opposed the plaintiff's application to annul the Singapore bankruptcy order.
5	2011-sghc-196 01 Sep 2011	01 Sep 2011	Defendant, Respondent	LostThe appeal against the order compelling the plaintiff to provide further and better particulars of its claim was dismissed.
6	2010-sghc-136 02 May 2010	02 May 2010	Respondent, Defendant	WonPlaintiffs’ appeals were dismissed with costs. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2010-sghc-112 13 Apr 2010	13 Apr 2010	Defendant	LostMareva injunction granted against the first, second, and fourth defendants on their assets up to the value of S$600,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
8	2001-sghc-381 30 Dec 2001	30 Dec 2001	Defendant	DismissedThe plaintiff company's claims against the fourth defendant were dismissed. (Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).