Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd

Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 7 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
3.5
Complex Cases
2 (50.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost13.0 parties avg
Won33.7 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202123.5 parties avg
200814.0 parties avg
200013.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost1(25.0%)
Won3(75.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD969,551.704 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20212
11
20081
1
20001
1

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
15 Aug 2021
PlaintiffWonJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $544,345.49, comprising unpaid amounts under the 2015 Agreements, the sum of $909.50 for goods sold and delivered, late payment interest of $64,493.50 (as at 2 January 2019), less the outstanding printing charges of $9,159.20 owed to Mazzy Creations, which should be set off against the sum due under the 2015 Rental Agreement. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
01 Feb 2021
DefendantLostDefendant's counterclaim for $2,880,385.78 dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
17 Sep 2008
Third PartyWonThird defendant's counterclaim against the first defendant in respect of the service agreements, amounting to $162,739.86; and an agreement dated 16 March 2005 (“Staff Agreement”) for a special deployment of staff, amounting to $37,370.54; and for goods sold amounting to $29,858.22 was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
29 Jun 2000
DefendantWonJudgment on counterclaim in the sum of $223,506.92. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.