Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd
Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 4 law firms. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd has been represented by 4 law firms and 7 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Averex Law Corporation | 1 case |
Tan Kok Quan Partnership | 1 case |
Allen & Gledhill LLP | 1 case |
Jimmy Harry & Partners | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 3.5
- Complex Cases
- 2 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 13.0 parties avg |
Won | 33.7 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 23.5 parties avg |
2008 | 14.0 parties avg |
2000 | 13.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Fuji Xerox Singapore Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(25.0%) |
Won | 3(75.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 969,551.704 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 2 11 |
2008 | 1 1 |
2000 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
15 Aug 2021 | Plaintiff | WonJudgment for the Plaintiff in the amount of $544,345.49, comprising unpaid amounts under the 2015 Agreements, the sum of $909.50 for goods sold and delivered, late payment interest of $64,493.50 (as at 2 January 2019), less the outstanding printing charges of $9,159.20 owed to Mazzy Creations, which should be set off against the sum due under the 2015 Rental Agreement. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
01 Feb 2021 | Defendant | LostDefendant's counterclaim for $2,880,385.78 dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
17 Sep 2008 | Third Party | WonThird defendant's counterclaim against the first defendant in respect of the service agreements, amounting to $162,739.86; and an agreement dated 16 March 2005 (“Staff Agreement”) for a special deployment of staff, amounting to $37,370.54; and for goods sold amounting to $29,858.22 was allowed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
29 Jun 2000 | Defendant | WonJudgment on counterclaim in the sum of $223,506.92. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |