Goh Bee Heong
Goh Bee Heong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Goh Bee Heong has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
VanillaLaw LLC | 1 case |
Vanilla Law LLC | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Goh Bee Heong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 8.0
- Complex Cases
- 3 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 28.0 parties avg |
Partial | 18.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 18.0 parties avg |
2019 | 18.0 parties avg |
2018 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Goh Bee Heong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 2(66.7%) |
Partial | 1(33.3%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 145,644.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2020 | 1 1 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 3 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
13 May 2020 | Appellant, Defendant | PartialAppeal allowed in part with costs to the appellants which we fixed at $15,000 plus reasonable disbursements to be taxed if not agreed. We set aside the part of the Judge’s decision below in relation to the Sums Received but affirmed the Assessment Judgment in respect of the Loans. The cost orders below were not disturbed. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |
06 Jun 2019 | Defendant | LostDamages assessed against Goh Bee Heong in the amount of S$291,288.00 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
18 Jan 2018 | Defendant | LostDefences struck out on the basis that they have committed inexcusable breaches of their discovery obligations and of the Unless Order. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |