Goh Teng Poh Karen

Goh Teng Poh Karen is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Goh Teng Poh Karen has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Wong Hin Pkin Wendell Tan Gim Hai Adrian Adrian Tan Joseph Yeo Chin Wei Yin Sophine

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Goh Teng Poh Karen's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Won	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2011	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2008	12.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Goh Teng Poh Karen's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Won	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	1,224,967.38	612,483.692 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2011	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2008	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2011-sghc-201 06 Sep 2011	06 Sep 2011	Defendant	LostJudgment against the defendant for $512,004.89 (in respect of Julian) and for $703,878.65 (in respect of Goh) and for continuing interest on the principal amounts owing by both of them at the contractual rate of 9% per annum from 1 November 2009 until payment. Judgment also awarded for the legal costs incurred by the plaintiff in pursuing its claims against them in court at $8,731.70 (for Julian) and $8,043.14 (for Goh). Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2008-sghc-52 07 Apr 2008	07 Apr 2008	Defendant	WonThe defendant successfully invoked the defense of qualified privilege, leading to the dismissal of the plaintiff's claim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.