Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd

Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 8 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd has been represented by 3 law firms and 8 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.2
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost22.0 parties avg
Partial12.0 parties avg
Won22.5 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
200632.3 parties avg
200212.0 parties avg
200112.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Golden Village Multiplex Pte Ltd's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(40.0%)
Partial1(20.0%)
Won2(40.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.003 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20062
12
20021
1
20011
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
20 Dec 2006
RespondentWonAppeal dismissed in favor of the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
27 Jun 2006
Plaintiff, AppellantWonAppeal allowed; the decision of the assistant registrar was reversed, and the first defendant's application to strike out the action was dismissed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
27 Feb 2006
PlaintiffPartialOrders made for the defendant to give a written undertaking not to act against the interests of the plaintiff as its director and not to participate in any manner in Suit 413 pending the outcome of SIC 3346 in that suit. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
24 Jan 2002
AppellantLostGolden Village's appeal was dismissed, and the agreement for lease was held to be enforceable in equity.
04 Jul 2001
PlaintiffLostThe plaintiff's claim that the agreement is void, illegal and/or unenforceable was dismissed with costs.