Hady Hartanto

Hady Hartanto is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. Their track record shows a 60.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Hady Hartanto has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	1 case	Devathas Satianathan Yam Wern-Jhien Josephine Chee Paul Tan
Straits Law Practice LLC	1 case	Suresh Nair Sukumaran Muralli Rajaram Raja

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Hady Hartanto's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 4.0
Complex Cases: 5 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	24.0 parties avg	4.0	40.0%
Won	34.0 parties avg	4.0	60.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2018	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2017	24.0 parties avg	4.0
2016	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Hady Hartanto's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(40.0%)	40.0%
Won	3(60.0%)	60.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	6,494,839.37	1,623,709.844 cases	4

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2014	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2018-sgcai-3 19 Jun 2018	19 Jun 2018	Respondent, Plaintiff	LostThe cross-appeal in CA 1/2017 is dismissed in its entirety. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2017-sghci-3 12 Mar 2017	12 Mar 2017	Plaintiff	WonThe court dismissed the Defendant's summons and ordered the Defendant to pay costs fixed at $10,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2017-sgcai-2 09 Feb 2017	09 Feb 2017	Respondent, Applicant, Plaintiff	WonThe respondent's application for additional security for costs was allowed, with the appellant ordered to furnish an additional SGD 20,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2016-sghci-6 06 Dec 2016	06 Dec 2016	Plaintiff	WonDamages awarded for unauthorized sales of shares, plus interest (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
5	2014-sghc-40 03 Mar 2014	03 Mar 2014	Plaintiff	LostClaim dismissed on grounds of justification and qualified privilege. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.