Imran Amin Valibhoy
Imran Amin Valibhoy is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Imran Amin Valibhoy has been represented by 2 law firms and 5 counsels.
| Law Firm | Cases Handled |
|---|---|
| Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP | 1 case |
| Derrick Wong & Lim BC LLP | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Imran Amin Valibhoy's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.5
- Complex Cases
- 2 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
| Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 14.0 parties avg |
| Neutral | 15.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
| Year | Cases |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 15.0 parties avg |
| 2016 | 14.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Imran Amin Valibhoy's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
| Outcome Type | Cases |
|---|---|
| Lost | 1(50.0%) |
| Neutral | 1(50.0%) |
Yearly Outcome Trends
| Year | Total Cases |
|---|---|
| 2023 | 1 1 |
| 2016 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 2 cases
| Case | Role | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
30 Nov 2023 | Respondent | NeutralJoined as respondent and directed to file a summons supported by an affidavit to make clear their position that in the event the MUIS Decisions were quashed, such a quashing order is not severable and must extend to them. |
28 Jan 2016 | Plaintiff | LostThe Plaintiffs' application in OS 355 to remove a trustee of a wakaf was legally unsustainable as the court had no subject matter jurisdiction over the VCT pursuant to the Trustees Act and the Plaintiffs had no locus standi to bring OS 355. |