Indra Krishnan
Indra Krishnan is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 6 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 7 counsels. Through 7 law firms. Their track record shows a 66.7% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Indra Krishnan has been represented by 7 law firms and 7 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew and Napier LLC | 2 cases |
Drew & Napier | 2 cases |
Allen & Gledhill | 1 case |
Allen and Gledhill | 1 case |
Drew & Napier LLC | 1 case |
Attorney-General’s Chambers | 1 case |
Peter Low Tang and Belinda Ang | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Indra Krishnan's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.5
- Complex Cases
- 3 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 113.0 parties avg |
Won | 43.0 parties avg |
12.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 28.5 parties avg |
2004 | 23.0 parties avg |
2001 | 22.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Indra Krishnan's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 1(16.7%) |
Won | 4(66.7%) |
1(16.7%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.003 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2007 | 2 11 |
2004 | 1 2 |
2001 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 6 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
31 May 2007 | Respondent | NeutralAppeal allowed in part, with a conditional discharge granted to the appellant. |
25 Jan 2007 | Respondent, Creditor | WonObjection to the discharge application was upheld (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
24 Nov 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the decision to refuse discharge from bankruptcy was dismissed in favor of the respondent. |
23 May 2004 | Respondent | WonThe appeal against the dismissal of the bankruptcy order was dismissed. |
06 Aug 2001 | Respondent | WonThe respondent successfully defended the appeal against the bankruptcy order. |
06 Aug 2001 | Respondent | Unknown |