Kamil Bin Jumat

Kamil Bin Jumat is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 3 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Kamil Bin Jumat has been represented by 2 law firms and 3 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Cairnhill Law LLC	1 case	Ashok Kumar Rai Derek Kang Yu Hsien
Ho & Wee LLP	1 case	Derek Kang Yu Hsien Debby Ratnasari

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kamil Bin Jumat's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 5.0
Complex Cases: 4 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	45.0 parties avg	5.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2022	25.0 parties avg	5.0
2021	15.0 parties avg	5.0
2018	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kamil Bin Jumat's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	4(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	300,000.00	150,000.002 cases	2
USD	1,400,000.00	700,000.002 cases	2

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2022	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2021	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2022-sghca-35 11 Oct 2022	11 Oct 2022	Defendant	LostThe Judge found Mr Maroju jointly and severally liable with two other defendants for conspiring to injure the plaintiff, Epoch Minerals Pte Ltd (EMPL), by unlawful means in respect of a total payment of US$600,000 that was given for a purpose that turned out to be untrue. (assumed USD, as the judgment specifies the amount in USD).
2	2022-sghc-21 27 Jan 2022	27 Jan 2022	Defendant	LostCosts of $300,000 plus disbursements awarded against the second to fourth defendants jointly and severally. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
3	2021-sghc-288 16 Dec 2021	16 Dec 2021	Defendant	LostJudgment against the second, third, and fourth defendants for a total of US$700,000.
4	2018-sghc-223 07 Oct 2018	07 Oct 2018	Defendant	LostAppeal for stay of proceedings dismissed (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).