Kempinski Hotels SA

Kempinski Hotels SA is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 4 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 75.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Kempinski Hotels SA has been represented by 1 law firm and 4 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Rajah & Tann LLP	1 case	Jansen Chow Jensen Chow Adrian Wong Andrea Baker

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Kempinski Hotels SA's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	25.0%
Won	32.0 parties avg	2.0	75.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2011	32.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Kempinski Hotels SA's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(25.0%)	25.0%
Won	3(75.0%)	75.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2011	1 3	Won: 3 cases (300.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 4 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2012-sgca-35 08 Jul 2012	08 Jul 2012	Respondent, Appellant	LostKempinski's cross-appeal in CA 98 is dismissed. Kempinski is ordered to pay the costs of these appeals and the proceedings below (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
2	2011-sghc-171 18 Jul 2011	18 Jul 2011	Applicant	WonApplication to set aside the Third Award, Fourth Award and Costs Award was allowed with costs. Assumed SGD as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
3	2011-sghc-172 18 Jul 2011	18 Jul 2011	Applicant, Claimant	WonApplication to set aside the arbitration award was allowed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
4	2011-sghc-173 18 Jul 2011	18 Jul 2011	Applicant, Claimant	WonApplication to set aside the costs award was allowed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).