Koh Khong Meng

Koh Khong Meng is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 8 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 12 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 50.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 8 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Koh Khong Meng has been represented by 3 law firms and 12 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Koh Khong Meng's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
9.0
Complex Cases
8 (100.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost39.3 parties avg
Partial19.0 parties avg
Won48.8 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
2019111.0 parties avg
201819.0 parties avg
2015111.0 parties avg
201416.0 parties avg
2012111.0 parties avg
200918.0 parties avg
200818.0 parties avg
200418.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Koh Khong Meng's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost3(37.5%)
Partial1(12.5%)
Won4(50.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD208,166.673 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20191
1
20181
1
20151
1
20141
1
20121
1
20091
1
20081
1
20041
1

Case History

Displaying all 8 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
14 Mar 2019
DefendantLostLiable for costs of $435,500 jointly and severally (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
21 Nov 2018
AppellantPartialThe appellant was jointly and severally liable to pay damages in the amount of $1,338,312.50 and costs of $189,000 (inclusive of disbursements) for Civil Appeal No 168 of 2015 and the related summonses. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
05 Aug 2015
DefendantLostCounterclaim for bidding exercise to proceed dismissed.
14 Oct 2014
DefendantLostJudgment against the Defendant for damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11 Nov 2012
DefendantWonThe defendant prevailed in the action to set aside the Consent Order (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11 Feb 2009
DefendantWonDefendant's application to proceed with the bidding process for the shares was granted.
22 Jun 2008
DefendantWonThe plaintiffs' application for further orders and/or clarification and/or variation of the consent order was dismissed.
23 Feb 2004
DefendantWonPrayers (1) – (3) of SIC 5864 of 2003 were allowed.