Patrick Ang

Patrick Ang is a legal practitioner in Singapore. With documented cases from 2001 to 2022. The lawyer has handled 16 cases in Singapore's courts. Associated with 6 law firms. The lawyer demonstrates particular expertise in company law and minority oppression. Their track record shows a 63.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have managed 7 complex cases, representing 44% of their total caseload.

Areas of Practice and Expertise

Patrick Ang has demonstrated expertise across 69 primary practice areas, with significant experience in contract law and company law.

Practice Area	Case Volume	Distribution	Expertise Level	Description
Contract Law	9 cases	7% of total caseload	General Practice48% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Company Law	9 cases	7% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 9 cases which represents 7% of their total caseload.
Civil Procedure	6 cases	5% of total caseload	General Practice32% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Corporate Law	6 cases	5% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 6 cases which represents 5% of their total caseload.
Minority Oppression	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Highly Specialized89% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Bankruptcy	5 cases	4% of total caseload	Experienced68% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 5 cases which represents 4% of their total caseload.
Insolvency Law	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Valuation	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced51% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Banking and Finance	3 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Agreement	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Arbitration	3 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice26% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 3 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shares	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice42% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Administrative Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Winding Up	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced55% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Judicial Management	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized87% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Rights	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Breach of Contract	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders’ dispute	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Agency Law	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice28% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Pre-action discovery	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Negligence	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Shareholders Disputes	2 cases	2% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Schemes of Arrangement	2 cases	2% of total caseload	Highly Specialized83% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 2 cases which represents 2% of their total caseload.
Trust Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Lifting corporate veil	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Defamation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Damages	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Companies Act	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Evidence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Dishonest assistance	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
CPF Contributions	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Valuation of Shares	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restraint Order	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Mortgage Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority shareholders	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Governance Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Corporate Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Co-broking agreement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized90% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Scheme of Arrangement	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
En Bloc Sale	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Reflective Loss	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate Agency	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Exchange Control Regulations	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Off-shore Banking	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Currency Speculation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice20% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Banking Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced65% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Leasing	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized75% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Litigation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice25% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Personal Injury	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice40% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Real Estate	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Shareholder Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Torts	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Restructuring and Dissolution	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fiduciary Duties	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized80% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Commercial Disputes	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Misrepresentation	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Fraud and Deceit	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Undue Influence	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced60% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Minority Shareholder Rights	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized85% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Separability	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice10% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Formation of contract	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced50% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Interim Judicial Management	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Highly Specialized92% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated deep specialization and significant involvement in complex mattersin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Frustration	1 cases	1% of total caseload	Experienced70% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated substantial experience and regular engagementin this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
International Commercial Law	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.
Estoppel	1 cases	1% of total caseload	General Practice30% relevance score	Patrick Ang has demonstrated general practice experiencein this area, handling 1 cases which represents 1% of their total caseload.

Law Firm Affiliations

Patrick Ang has been affiliated with 6 law firms. The most active affiliation involves 6 cases.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Workload Share	Recent Cases
Rajah & Tann Singapore LLP	6 cases	38% of cases	Re Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Interim Judicial Management Application by Cryptocurrency Platform(Aug 2022) Liew Kit Fah v Koh Keng Chew: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Buyout(Nov 2019) Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Rights, Oppression, and Valuation of Shares(Nov 2018)
Rajah & Tann	4 cases	25% of cases	Chew Eu Hock Construction v Central Provident Fund Board: Scheme of Arrangement & Priority of CPF Contributions(Sep 2003) Philip Motha Consultancy v Jones Lang Lasalle: Co-broking Agreement Dispute(Nov 2002) Hengwell v Thing Chiang Ching: Representative Action for Misappropriation of Funds(Jul 2002)
Rajah & Tann LLP	3 cases	19% of cases	Ching Mun Fong v Standard Chartered Bank: Pre-Action Discovery in Contract/Tort Dispute(Jul 2012) Ching Mun Fong v Standard Chartered Bank: Pre-Action Discovery in Contract and Tort Claims(Jan 2012) Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi(Jan 2010)
Rajah & Tan Singapore LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Oppression Claim(Mar 2017)
Rajah & Tan LLP	1 cases	6% of cases	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Corporate Governance(Jul 2016)
Rajah and Tann	1 cases	6% of cases	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf City: Shareholder Dispute & Settlement Agreement Enforcement(Feb 2004)

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Patrick Ang's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 12.5
Complex Cases: 7 (44%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	217.2 parties avg	17.2	13%
Neutral	25.0 parties avg	5.0	13%
Partial	214.0 parties avg	14.0	13%
Won	108.9 parties avg	8.9	63%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2001	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2002	22.7 parties avg	2.7
2003	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2004	18.0 parties avg	8.0
2010	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2012	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2015	23.3 parties avg	3.3
2016	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2017	119.0 parties avg	19.0
2018	218.0 parties avg	18.0
2019	19.0 parties avg	9.0
2022	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Patrick Ang's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	2(13%)	13%
Neutral	2(13%)	13%
Partial	2(13%)	13%
Won	10(63%)	63%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	4,500.00	750.006 cases	6

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2001	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2002	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2003	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2004	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	2 2	Won: 2 cases (100.0%)
2015	2 11	Neutral: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2016	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)
2017	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2018	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Won: 1 cases (50.0%)
2019	1 1	Partial: 1 cases (100.0%)
2022	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 16 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Party & Outcome
1	Re Hodlnaut Pte Ltd: Interim Judicial Management Application by Cryptocurrency Platform 30 Aug 2022 S.A.M. Fintech Pte Ltd (Other)Neutral	30 Aug 2022	S.A.M. Fintech Pte Ltd (Other): NeutralS.A.M. Fintech Pte Ltd was mentioned as a related entity under judicial management.
2	Liew Kit Fah v Koh Keng Chew: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Buyout 26 Nov 2019 Poh Teck Chuan (Appellant)Partial	26 Nov 2019	Poh Teck Chuan (Appellant): Appeal Allowed in PartThe independent valuer is to re-value the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group taking into account the discount for lack of control. The independent valuer is free to decide whether the discount for lack of marketability should apply in re-valuing the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group. In the event the independent valuer’s re-valuation of the respondents’ shares in the Samwoh Group returns a value less than that in its 3 August 2018 report, the respondents are to refund the appellants the difference between the sum that they were bought out with and the re-valued price of their shares in the Samwoh Group.
3	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Rights, Oppression, and Valuation of Shares 27 Nov 2018 Sam Land Pte Ltd (Defendant)Lost	27 Nov 2018	Sam Land Pte Ltd (Defendant): Discounts for lack of control and free transferability not appliedCourt directed that discounts for lack of control and lack of free transferability were not to be applied to the valuation of the plaintiffs’ shares.
4	Lim Lee Lee v United Overseas Bank Ltd: Bankruptcy Proceedings and Undue Influence in Mortgage Agreements 02 Apr 2018 United Overseas Bank Limited (Defendant, Appellant)Won	02 Apr 2018	United Overseas Bank Limited (Defendant, Appellant): Appeal AllowedThe defendant's appeal was allowed, reversing the order setting aside the statutory demand.
5	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Share Valuation Dispute in Minority Shareholder Oppression Claim 12 Mar 2017 Poh Teck Chuan (Defendant)Partial	12 Mar 2017	Poh Teck Chuan (Defendant): Required to purchase plaintiffs' sharesThe court determined the reference date for the valuation of the plaintiffs' shares to be 17 February 2016.
6	Koh Keng Chew v Liew Kit Fah: Minority Shareholder Oppression & Corporate Governance 28 Jul 2016 Poh Teck Chuan (Defendant)Won	28 Jul 2016	Poh Teck Chuan (Defendant): To purchase shares of plaintiffsThe court ordered the 1st to 6th defendants to purchase the shares of the plaintiffs.
7	Re Punj Lloyd: Scheme of Arrangement & Creditor Opposition 15 Dec 2015 Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Neutral	15 Dec 2015	Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Orders for meetings to be held not set asideThe court refused to set aside the orders for meetings to be held under s 210(1) of the Companies Act.
8	Re Sembawang Engineers: Convening Creditors Meeting for Scheme of Arrangement 22 Sep 2015 Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant)Won	22 Sep 2015	Sembawang Engineers and Constructors Pte Ltd (Applicant): Application AllowedThe company's application under s 210(1) of the Companies Act was allowed, with a modification to convene the meeting within four months.
9	Ching Mun Fong v Standard Chartered Bank: Pre-Action Discovery in Contract/Tort Dispute 25 Jul 2012 Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent)Won	25 Jul 2012	Standard Chartered Bank (Respondent): Appeal DismissedAppeal against the bank was dismissed with costs.
10	Ching Mun Fong v Standard Chartered Bank: Pre-Action Discovery in Contract and Tort Claims 08 Jan 2012 Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant, Respondent)Won	08 Jan 2012	Standard Chartered Bank (Defendant, Respondent): Appeal DismissedCosts of $4,500 awarded to the defendant on an indemnity basis (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
11	Standard Chartered Bank v Loh Chong Yong Thomas: Striking Out Application & Bankrupt's Locus Standi 28 Jan 2010 Standard Chartered Bank (Appellant)Won	28 Jan 2010	Standard Chartered Bank (Appellant): Appeal AllowedAppeal allowed; the court found in favor of the appellant. Costs to be borne by each party. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
12	Yeo Boong Hua v Turf City: Shareholder Dispute & Settlement Agreement Enforcement 23 Feb 2004 Teo Tian Seng (Defendant)Won	23 Feb 2004	Teo Tian Seng (Defendant): Application to expunge references to without-prejudice correspondence was allowedPrayers (1) – (3) of SIC 5864 of 2003 were allowed.
13	Chew Eu Hock Construction v Central Provident Fund Board: Scheme of Arrangement & Priority of CPF Contributions 07 Sep 2003 Chew Eu Hock Construction Co Pte Ltd (under judicial management) (Plaintiff)Won	07 Sep 2003	Chew Eu Hock Construction Co Pte Ltd (under judicial management) (Plaintiff): Order granted that the Central Provident Fund Board be bound by the scheme of arrangementOrder granted that the defendants be bound by the terms of the scheme of arrangement effected on 16 December 2002 between the plaintiff, unsecured creditors of the Company and CEH. The currency is assumed to be SGD, the currency of Singapore.
14	Philip Motha Consultancy v Jones Lang Lasalle: Co-broking Agreement Dispute 26 Nov 2002 Jones Lang Lasalle Property Consultants Pte Ltd (formerly known as JLW Property Consultants Pte Ltd) (Defendant)Won	26 Nov 2002	Jones Lang Lasalle Property Consultants Pte Ltd (formerly known as JLW Property Consultants Pte Ltd) (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantThe defendant successfully defended against the plaintiff's claim.
15	Hengwell v Thing Chiang Ching: Representative Action for Misappropriation of Funds 14 Jul 2002 Far East Packaging Industrial Pte Limited (Defendant)Lost	14 Jul 2002	Far East Packaging Industrial Pte Limited (Defendant): Application AllowedThe application to commence an action against the defendant was allowed.
16	Shenyin Wangou-APS v Commerzbank: Frustration of Contract & Exchange Control 04 Sep 2001 Commerzbank (South-East Asia) Ltd (Defendant)Won	04 Sep 2001	Commerzbank (South-East Asia) Ltd (Defendant): Judgment for DefendantJudgment in favour of the defendant. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.