Lam Chi Kin David

Lam Chi Kin David is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 5 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 3 law firms. Their track record shows a 20.0% success rate in resolved cases.

Legal Representation

Lam Chi Kin David has been represented by 3 law firms and 6 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Lam Chi Kin David's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
2.0
Complex Cases
0 (0.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost22.0 parties avg
Partial22.0 parties avg
Won12.0 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
201212.0 parties avg
201032.0 parties avg
200912.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Lam Chi Kin David's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost2(40.0%)
Partial2(40.0%)
Won1(20.0%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
JPY29,062,179.351 cases
SGD50,000.002 cases
USD128,192.091 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20121
1
20103
111
20091
1

Case History

Displaying all 5 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
03 Sep 2012
Plaintiff, AppellantPartialDamages awarded to the plaintiff in the amount of $128,192.09. The currency was amended from SGD to USD. Pre-judgment interest of 5.33% to commence from 2008-10-13. Assumed USD as the damages were initially recorded as SGD but intended to be in USD.
30 Nov 2010
AppellantWonThe appellant's appeal was allowed with costs. The appellant is entitled to damages, if any, to be assessed by the Registrar on the basis that the respondent was only entitled to close out his FX positions on 13 October 2008 at the earliest.
27 Jul 2010
Defendant, AppellantPartialThe amount of security was varied from $500,000 to $100,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
09 Feb 2010
PlaintiffLostPlaintiff's claim for wrongful closure of FX positions was dismissed with costs. Assumed currency is Singapore Dollar (SGD) as the judgment originates from Singapore.
14 May 2009
Defendant, AppellantLostAppeal dismissed; defendant liable for JPY 29,062,179.35, contractual compound interest and costs of SD 4,000 and disbursements.