Lee Hsien Loong
Lee Hsien Loong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 13 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 20 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 69.2% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 6 complex cases, representing 46.2% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Lee Hsien Loong has been represented by 5 law firms and 20 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Drew & Napier LLC | 3 cases |
Davinder Singh Chambers LLC | 1 case |
Drew and Napier LLC | 1 case |
Attorney-General’s Chambers | 1 case |
Independent Practitioner | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Lee Hsien Loong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.2
- Complex Cases
- 6 (46.2%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 13.0 parties avg |
Neutral | 34.0 parties avg |
Won | 94.3 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 13.0 parties avg |
2019 | 22.0 parties avg |
2018 | 13.0 parties avg |
2015 | 23.5 parties avg |
2014 | 12.0 parties avg |
2007 | 46.3 parties avg |
2006 | 25.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Lee Hsien Loong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 1(7.7%) |
Neutral | 3(23.1%) |
Won | 9(69.2%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 55,142.867 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2021 | 1 1 |
2019 | 2 11 |
2018 | 1 1 |
2015 | 1 2 |
2014 | 1 1 |
2007 | 3 112 |
2006 | 2 11 |
Case History
Displaying all 13 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
31 Aug 2021 | Plaintiff | WonDamages awarded in the amount of $210,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
26 Sep 2019 | Respondent | WonAppeal against striking out counterclaim allowed; appellant to pay respondent costs fixed at $20,000, inclusive of disbursements (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
11 Mar 2019 | Plaintiff, Defendant in Counterclaim | NeutralThe court dismissed the defendant's application to strike out the plaintiff's claim, allowing the defamation suit to proceed to trial. |
04 Oct 2018 | Defendant | WonJudgment in favour of the defendant; the plaintiff's claim was struck out. |
16 Dec 2015 | Plaintiff | WonDamages awarded in the sum of $150,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Jul 2015 | Plaintiff, Respondent | WonCosts of SGD 6,000 awarded to Mr. Lee, to be paid by Mr. Ngerng (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
06 Nov 2014 | Plaintiff | WonInterlocutory judgment granted to the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. The currency is assumed to be SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
05 Nov 2007 | Plaintiff, Respondent | WonThe applications for extension of time to file appeals and waiver of security deposit were dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
16 Oct 2007 | Plaintiff | WonApplication to admit QC was dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
31 May 2007 | Respondent | NeutralApplication for ad hoc admission of Queen's Counsel to represent the defendants was dismissed. |
20 Feb 2007 | Plaintiff, Respondent | LostAppeals dismissed. |
30 Nov 2006 | Plaintiff | WonInterlocutory judgment entered for the plaintiff with damages to be assessed. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
12 Sep 2006 | Plaintiff | NeutralMentioned as plaintiff in Suit 261/2006, but no specific outcome for this party in this judgment. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |