Liew Kum Chong

Liew Kum Chong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 3 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 5 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 100.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 3 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Liew Kum Chong has been represented by 1 law firm and 5 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
WongPartnership LLP	1 case	Khoo Kiah Min Jolyn Tang Shangwei Jolyn Khoo Gavin Neo Tang Shang Wei

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Liew Kum Chong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 6.0
Complex Cases: 3 (100.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Won	36.0 parties avg	6.0	100.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2020	26.0 parties avg	6.0
2019	16.0 parties avg	6.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Liew Kum Chong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Won	3(100.0%)	100.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	801,500.00	267,166.673 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2020	1 2	Won: 2 cases (200.0%)
2019	1 1	Won: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 3 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2020-sgca-63 30 Jun 2020	30 Jun 2020	Respondent, Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the Plaintiff; costs of $35,000 (inclusive of disbursements) to be paid by all the appellants to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2020-sghcr-2 30 Mar 2020	30 Mar 2020	Plaintiff	WonApplication to attach the 2nd Defendant's interest in a commercial property was allowed. Costs fixed at $1,500 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
3	2019-sghc-163 10 Jul 2019	10 Jul 2019	Plaintiff	WonJudgment for the plaintiff in the sum of $200,000 against SVM, $100,000 against Feasto, $100,000 against Mizimegah and $400,000 against Scarlett. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.