Lim Eng Hock Peter
Lim Eng Hock Peter is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 10 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 16 counsels. Through 5 law firms. Their track record shows a 40.0% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 5 complex cases, representing 50.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Lim Eng Hock Peter has been represented by 5 law firms and 16 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
WongPartnership LLP | 2 cases |
Wong Partnership LLP | 4 cases |
TSMP Law Corporation | 1 case |
Wee Swee Teow & Co | 1 case |
Independent Practitioner | 1 case |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Lim Eng Hock Peter's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 4.8
- Complex Cases
- 5 (50.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 24.5 parties avg |
Partial | 44.8 parties avg |
Won | 45.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2012 | 17.0 parties avg |
2011 | 13.0 parties avg |
2010 | 34.0 parties avg |
2009 | 13.0 parties avg |
2008 | 35.7 parties avg |
2003 | 16.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Lim Eng Hock Peter's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Neutral | 2(20.0%) |
Partial | 4(40.0%) |
Won | 4(40.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 222,000.005 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2012 | 1 1 |
2011 | 1 1 |
2010 | 2 12 |
2009 | 1 1 |
2008 | 3 111 |
2003 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 10 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
30 Oct 2012 | Respondent, Defendant, Appellant | PartialPeter Lim's claim of conspiracy against Margaret Tung and Lin Jian Wei was partially allowed. |
30 May 2011 | Respondent | PartialThe costs awarded to the respondent were reduced from $650,000 to $250,000. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
29 Sep 2010 | Defendant | WonJudgment in favour of Peter Lim. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Aug 2010 | Plaintiff | WonCosts awarded to the Plaintiff in the amount of $650,000 on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
27 Jul 2010 | Appellant | PartialAppeal dismissed; damages awarded in the amount of $210,000 (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore). |
07 Oct 2009 | Appellant | WonAppeal allowed; judgment for the Appellant for damages and costs. Damages awarded on an aggravated basis. Costs awarded on an indemnity basis. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
25 Aug 2008 | Defendant | WonThe court upheld the order for discovery of documents requested by the first defendant. |
08 Jul 2008 | Plaintiff | NeutralThe plaintiff successfully opposed the defendants' application to strike out the defamation action. |
26 Feb 2008 | Defendant, Appellant | PartialAppeal dismissed except for variations to paragraphs 14 and 46. |
09 Apr 2003 | Third Party | NeutralThe outcome of the third party proceedings did not directly impact the third party Lim Eng Hock Peter. |