Low Tuck Kwong

Low Tuck Kwong is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 10 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 2 complex cases, representing 28.6% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Low Tuck Kwong has been represented by 2 law firms and 10 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Premier Law LLC	1 case	Siraj Omar
Drew & Napier LLC	1 case	Davinder Singh Tony Yeo Soo Mong Rozalynne Asmali Tony Yeo Meryl Koh Yeo Soo Mong Tony DK Rozalynne PG Dato Asmali Koh Wei Ser Joanna Chung Su-Ling Lauren

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Low Tuck Kwong's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.9
Complex Cases: 2 (28.6%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	62.7 parties avg	2.7	85.7%
Neutral	14.0 parties avg	4.0	14.3%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2014	14.0 parties avg	4.0
2012	12.0 parties avg	2.0
2010	22.0 parties avg	2.0
2009	22.5 parties avg	2.5
2008	15.0 parties avg	5.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Low Tuck Kwong's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	6(85.7%)	85.7%
Neutral	1(14.3%)	14.3%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.003 cases	3

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2014	1 1	Neutral: 1 cases (100.0%)
2012	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)
2010	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2009	1 2	Lost: 2 cases (200.0%)
2008	1 1	Lost: 1 cases (100.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2014-sgca-21 28 Apr 2014	28 Apr 2014	Other	NeutralNo specific outcome for Low Tuck Kwong. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2012-sghc-233 21 Nov 2012	21 Nov 2012	Plaintiff	LostPlaintiff's claim in defamation and malicious falsehood was dismissed.
3	2010-sghc-266 05 Sep 2010	05 Sep 2010	Defendant	LostClaim dismissed against the Defendant. Assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore.
4	2010-sghc-159 24 May 2010	24 May 2010	Plaintiff, Respondent	LostThe plaintiff's appeal against the dismissal of his application to strike out the defendant's counterclaim was dismissed.
5	2009-sghc-147 23 Jun 2009	23 Jun 2009	Plaintiff, Appellant	LostAppeal against the decision to grant leave to amend the Defence was dismissed with costs (assumed SGD, as the judgment originates from Singapore).
6	2009-sgca-20 27 May 2009	27 May 2009	Appellant, Respondent	LostAppeal dismissed with costs to the respondent. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
7	2008-sghc-182 21 Oct 2008	21 Oct 2008	Plaintiff	LostThe plaintiff's claim was dismissed with costs to the defendant.