Mercator & Noordstar NV

Mercator & Noordstar NV is a corporation in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 2 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 2 counsels. Through 1 law firm.

Legal Representation

Mercator & Noordstar NV has been represented by 1 law firm and 2 counsels.

Law Firm	Cases Handled	Counsels
Wong & Leow LLC	2 cases	Dinesh Dhillon Koh Kok Wah

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mercator & Noordstar NV's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case: 2.0
Complex Cases: 0 (0.0%); Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

Type	Cases	Avg Parties	Distribution
Lost	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%
Partial	12.0 parties avg	2.0	50.0%

Complexity Trends Over Time

Year	Cases	Average Parties
2003	22.0 parties avg	2.0

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mercator & Noordstar NV's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome Type	Cases	Percentage
Lost	1(50.0%)	50.0%
Partial	1(50.0%)	50.0%

Monetary Outcomes

Currency	Total Amount	Average	Cases
SGD	0.00	0.001 cases	1
USD	5,080,000.00	5,080,000.001 cases	1

Yearly Outcome Trends

Year	Total Cases	Outcome Distribution
2003	2 11	Lost: 1 cases (50.0%) Partial: 1 cases (50.0%)

Case History

Displaying all 2 cases

No.	Case	Decision Date	Role	Outcome
1	2003-sgca-37 22 Sep 2003	22 Sep 2003	Appellant	PartialAppeal allowed in part relating to the substantive issue. The court declared that the plaintiff has not proven that the payment of US$5,080,000 made by Velstra to Mercator on 5 January 2000 constitutes a transaction at an undervalue within the meaning of s 98 of the Bankruptcy Act read with s 329 of the Companies Act. The appellant has not succeeded on the issue of “transaction”, it shall only be entitled to 60% of the costs, here and below. Appeal on the procedural matter dismissed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
2	2003-sghc-35 23 Feb 2003	23 Feb 2003	Defendant	LostThe court dismissed the defendant's arguments and ordered them to return the US$5.08 million to the plaintiffs. Assumed USD, as the payment was made in USD.