Mitsuji Konoshita

Mitsuji Konoshita is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 28.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.

Legal Representation

Mitsuji Konoshita has been represented by 1 law firm and 11 counsels.

Case Complexity Analysis

Analysis of Mitsuji Konoshita's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.

Complexity Overview

Average Parties per Case
8.1
Complex Cases
7 (100.0%)
Cases with more than 3 parties

Complexity by Case Type

TypeCases
Lost47.8 parties avg
Partial19.0 parties avg
Won28.5 parties avg

Complexity Trends Over Time

YearCases
202327.0 parties avg
202119.0 parties avg
202029.0 parties avg
201918.0 parties avg
201818.0 parties avg

Case Outcome Analytics

Analysis of Mitsuji Konoshita's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.

Outcome Distribution

Outcome TypeCases
Lost4(57.1%)
Partial1(14.3%)
Won2(28.6%)

Monetary Outcomes

CurrencyAverage
SGD0.002 cases
USD58,158,284.673 cases

Yearly Outcome Trends

YearTotal Cases
20231
2
20211
1
20202
11
20191
1
20181
1

Case History

Displaying all 7 cases

CaseRoleOutcome
21 Nov 2023
Appellant, DefendantLostAppeal dismissed; liable for damages of US$124,474,854.00 plus interest.
15 Jun 2023
DefendantLostClaim allowed against the defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $124,474,854.00 (USD).
25 Mar 2021
RespondentPartialThe reinstated Mareva injunctions be extended until the respondents satisfy the Judgment Sum and costs. The enjoined quantum of the Mareva injunctions be reduced to US$50 million. R1 and R2 are to file a fresh affidavit within three weeks to disclose assets up to the value of US$100 million, unless the Judgment Sum and costs are paid up by then. Any valuation of assets so disclosed must be properly supported and not based on incomplete, arbitrary or subjective belief. Assumed USD as the judgment refers to USD amounts.
31 May 2020
RespondentLostDomestic Mareva injunction against Mitsuji Konoshita reinstated. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore.
11 Feb 2020
DefendantWonJudgment for the Defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore.
31 Jan 2019
Defendant, ApplicantLostApplication to strike out the plaintiff’s action is dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge.
22 Feb 2018
DefendantWonDefendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was allowed.