Mitsuji Konoshita
Mitsuji Konoshita is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 7 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 11 counsels. Through 1 law firm. Their track record shows a 28.6% success rate in resolved cases. They have been involved in 7 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Mitsuji Konoshita has been represented by 1 law firm and 11 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
Dentons Rodyk & Davidson LLP | 3 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Mitsuji Konoshita's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 8.1
- Complex Cases
- 7 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 47.8 parties avg |
Partial | 19.0 parties avg |
Won | 28.5 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 27.0 parties avg |
2021 | 19.0 parties avg |
2020 | 29.0 parties avg |
2019 | 18.0 parties avg |
2018 | 18.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Mitsuji Konoshita's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 4(57.1%) |
Partial | 1(14.3%) |
Won | 2(28.6%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
USD | 58,158,284.673 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2023 | 1 2 |
2021 | 1 1 |
2020 | 2 11 |
2019 | 1 1 |
2018 | 1 1 |
Case History
Displaying all 7 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
21 Nov 2023 | Appellant, Defendant | LostAppeal dismissed; liable for damages of US$124,474,854.00 plus interest. |
15 Jun 2023 | Defendant | LostClaim allowed against the defendant; damages to be paid in the amount of $124,474,854.00 (USD). |
25 Mar 2021 | Respondent | PartialThe reinstated Mareva injunctions be extended until the respondents satisfy the Judgment Sum and costs. The enjoined quantum of the Mareva injunctions be reduced to US$50 million. R1 and R2 are to file a fresh affidavit within three weeks to disclose assets up to the value of US$100 million, unless the Judgment Sum and costs are paid up by then. Any valuation of assets so disclosed must be properly supported and not based on incomplete, arbitrary or subjective belief. Assumed USD as the judgment refers to USD amounts. |
31 May 2020 | Respondent | LostDomestic Mareva injunction against Mitsuji Konoshita reinstated. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Feb 2020 | Defendant | WonJudgment for the Defendant; plaintiff's claims dismissed. The judgment does not specify a currency, so SGD is assumed as the jurisdiction is Singapore. |
31 Jan 2019 | Defendant, Applicant | LostApplication to strike out the plaintiff’s action is dismissed with costs reserved to the trial judge. |
22 Feb 2018 | Defendant | WonDefendant's application to set aside the Mareva injunction was allowed. |