Murakami Takako
Murakami Takako is a individual in Singapore's legal system. The party has been involved in 4 cases in Singapore's courts. Represented by 6 counsels. Through 2 law firms. They have been involved in 4 complex cases, representing 100.0% of their total caseload.
Legal Representation
Murakami Takako has been represented by 2 law firms and 6 counsels.
Law Firm | Cases Handled |
---|---|
WongPartnership | 1 case |
ACIES Law Corporation | 2 cases |
Case Complexity Analysis
Analysis of Murakami Takako's case complexity based on the number of parties involved and case characteristics.
Complexity Overview
- Average Parties per Case
- 5.0
- Complex Cases
- 4 (100.0%)
- Cases with more than 3 parties
Complexity by Case Type
Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 35.0 parties avg |
Partial | 15.0 parties avg |
Complexity Trends Over Time
Year | Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 25.0 parties avg |
2007 | 25.0 parties avg |
Case Outcome Analytics
Analysis of Murakami Takako's case outcomes, including distribution by type, yearly trends, and monetary outcomes where applicable.
Outcome Distribution
Outcome Type | Cases |
---|---|
Lost | 3(75.0%) |
Partial | 1(25.0%) |
Monetary Outcomes
Currency | Average |
---|---|
SGD | 0.002 cases |
Yearly Outcome Trends
Year | Total Cases |
---|---|
2008 | 2 11 |
2007 | 1 2 |
Case History
Displaying all 4 cases
Case | Role | Outcome |
---|---|---|
11 Nov 2008 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs; the Judge’s decision to disallow the appellant’s application to include the Claims in her statement of claim is affirmed. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
31 Mar 2008 | Plaintiff | PartialAmendment to include movables (Westpac Bank accounts) permitted, but not for foreign immovables in Australia and Indonesia. |
29 Aug 2007 | Appellant | LostAppeal dismissed with costs and the usual consequential orders. Assumed SGD as the judgment originates from Singapore. |
11 Jan 2007 | Plaintiff | LostThe plaintiff's application to prevent the defendants from amending their defence and adding a fourth defendant was denied. |